comp.lang.c++

Alf P. Steinbach wrote:

> * Default User:

> > If they wanted that, they could have said, "void* and char* shall
> > have the same representation". They very specifically said that
> > void* is the same a char*.
>
> If "they" didn't want that paragraph to mean "Pascal is really
> better", then "they" wouldn't have used that blindingly-obvious code
> phrase "cv-qualified or cv-unqualified", but simply said nothing
> about that. So it's obvious that the sentence means "Pascal is really
> better".

I don't see how that follows. However, you're obviously determined to
be stubborn about it. I don't agree, and won't agree, that there is any
sort of commutative property expressed. You are free to hold a
differing opinion.




Brian