soc.veterans

On 11 Apr 2008 19:51:33 -0400, adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:

>... nothing ...

It's all you have, bushkultie.

If you had anything, and had any stones,
you'd be contacting the UN official, among
many others.

You can't because you have nothing.

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:07:45 -0800, 4033 Dead wrote:

>http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465?page_no=1
>
>U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11
>
>By ELI LAKE
>Staff Reporter of the Sun
>April 10, 2008
>A D V E R T I S E M E N T
>A D V E R T I S E M E N T
>
>WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to
>monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role
>neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist
>attacks.
>
>On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law
>emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a
>newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict
>between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty
>is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he
>has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11
>official version."
>
>On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of
>Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, "It is possibly
>true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a
>situation in the country and in the world where something had to
>happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about
>the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't
>think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is
>there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official
>investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and
>that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people
>and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in
>what really happened than they presently possess."
>
>Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian
>Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk,
>"I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11
>truth movement."
>
>He added, "Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest
>and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable
>reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false
>flag operation is very strong."
>
>The narrative that the attacks from 2001 were a "false flag" operation
>is a recurring theme in the literature challenging the consensus that
>19 Al Qaeda hijackers flew commercial jets into the World Trade Center
>and the Pentagon. False flag refers to espionage or covert actions
>taken by one government made to seem like the work of another. The
>false flag thesis has it that the Bush administration is somehow
>responsible for the September 11 attacks as a pretext for the wars in
>Afghanistan and Iraq.
>
>Mr. Falk yesterday did not return e-mails and phone calls asking for a
>comment. But in 2004 he wrote the foreword to the book "The New Pearl
>Harbor," by David Ray Griffin. Mr. Griffin has posited that such an
>inside job is the likely explanation for the attacks.
>
>--
>"Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government
>talking
>about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order.
>Nothing has
>changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists,
>we're
>talking about getting a court order before we do so"
>-George W. Bush, April 20, 2004
>
>Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
>Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
>
>http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
>For news feed, http://yahoogroups/subscribe/zepps_news
>For essays (please contribute!)
>http:yahoogroups/subscribe/zepps_essays
>
>


On 11 Apr 2008 10:54:27 -0400, adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:

>And how do you know this?

The real issue is why can't you figure it out?

>What does it have to do with WTC on 9/11?

You must be really stupid, indeed, even for
a bushkultie.

On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:58:58 -0700, Bill Smith wrote:

>On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:07:26 -0400, Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks, Jessie. your intelligence, honesty, and
>>courage are greatly appreciated by those of us who
>>value truth, freedom, and justice.....
>>
>>http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2008/040208_jesse_ventura.htm
>>
>> "Having undergone Basic Underwater Demolition Seal training, Ventura
>>is speaking from an experienced standpoint and he unequivocally stated
>>that he thought the buildings were deliberately imploded.
>>
>>"I did watch the film of Building 7 going down and in my opinion there's
>>no doubt that that building was brought down with demolition," said the
>>former Governor.
>>
>>"Two planes struck two buildings....but how is it that a third building
>>fell 5 hours later?" asked Ventura, "How could this building just
>>implode into its own footprint 5 hours later - that's my first question
>>- the 9/11 Commission didn't even devote one page to that in their big
>>volume of investigation," added the former Governor.
>>
>> Ventura said that the corporate media were going to continue to
>>cover-up the truth about 9/11, but that the number of credible people
>>speaking out and increasing education and knowledge about the subject
>>would eventually reap dividends."
>>
>>"We don't want to lose our country, after all it's still our country
>>and until they put us down we have the power," Ventura concluded.
>
>Did you ever notice how much preparation goes into a controlled
>demolition? ...

You don't need anywhere near as much when
you don't care about the surrounding structures.

That fact sure has the bushkultie squirming.