soc.veterans

In article ,
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:07:45 -0800, 4033 Dead wrote:
>
>>
>>http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465?page_no=1
>>
>>U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11
>>
>>By ELI LAKE
>>Staff Reporter of the Sun
>>April 10, 2008
>>A D V E R T I S E M E N T
>>A D V E R T I S E M E N T
>>
>>WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to
>>monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role
>>neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist
>>attacks.
>>
>>On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law
>>emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a
>>newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict
>>between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty
>>is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he
>>has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11
>>official version."
>>
>>On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of
>>Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, "It is possibly
>>true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a
>>situation in the country and in the world where something had to
>>happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about
>>the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't
>>think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is
>>there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official
>>investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and
>>that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people
>>and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in
>>what really happened than they presently possess."
>>
>>Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian
>>Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk,
>>"I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11
>>truth movement."
>>
>>He added, "Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest
>>and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable
>>reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false
>>flag operation is very strong."
>>
>>The narrative that the attacks from 2001 were a "false flag" operation
>>is a recurring theme in the literature challenging the consensus that
>>19 Al Qaeda hijackers flew commercial jets into the World Trade Center
>>and the Pentagon. False flag refers to espionage or covert actions
>>taken by one government made to seem like the work of another. The
>>false flag thesis has it that the Bush administration is somehow
>>responsible for the September 11 attacks as a pretext for the wars in
>>Afghanistan and Iraq.
>>
>>Mr. Falk yesterday did not return e-mails and phone calls asking for a
>>comment. But in 2004 he wrote the foreword to the book "The New Pearl
>>Harbor," by David Ray Griffin. Mr. Griffin has posited that such an
>>inside job is the likely explanation for the attacks.
>>
>>--
>>"Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government
>>talking
>>about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order.
>>Nothing has
>>changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists,
>>we're
>>talking about getting a court order before we do so"
>>-George W. Bush, April 20, 2004
>>
>>Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
>>Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
>>
>>http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
>>For news feed, http://yahoogroups/subscribe/zepps_news
>>For essays (please contribute!)
>>http:yahoogroups/subscribe/zepps_essays
>>
>>
>
>
>On 11 Apr 2008 10:54:27 -0400, adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>
>>And how do you know this?
>
>The real issue is why can't you figure it out?
>
>>What does it have to do with WTC on 9/11?
>
>You must be really stupid, indeed, even for
>a bushkultie.
>
>On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:58:58 -0700, Bill Smith wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:07:26 -0400, Henry <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, Jessie. your intelligence, honesty, and
>>>courage are greatly appreciated by those of us who
>>>value truth, freedom, and justice.....
>>>
>>>http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2008/040208_jesse_ventura.htm
>>>
>>> "Having undergone Basic Underwater Demolition Seal training, Ventura
>>>is speaking from an experienced standpoint and he unequivocally stated
>>>that he thought the buildings were deliberately imploded.
>>>
>>>"I did watch the film of Building 7 going down and in my opinion there's
>>>no doubt that that building was brought down with demolition," said the
>>>former Governor.
>>>
>>>"Two planes struck two buildings....but how is it that a third building
>>>fell 5 hours later?" asked Ventura, "How could this building just
>>>implode into its own footprint 5 hours later - that's my first question
>>>- the 9/11 Commission didn't even devote one page to that in their big
>>>volume of investigation," added the former Governor.
>>>
>>> Ventura said that the corporate media were going to continue to
>>>cover-up the truth about 9/11, but that the number of credible people
>>>speaking out and increasing education and knowledge about the subject
>>>would eventually reap dividends."
>>>
>>>"We don't want to lose our country, after all it's still our country
>>>and until they put us down we have the power," Ventura concluded.
>>
>>Did you ever notice how much preparation goes into a controlled
>>demolition? ...
>
>You don't need anywhere near as much when
>you don't care about the surrounding structures.



Which, even if true, has nothing to do with WTC on 9/11 because there
is absolutely no evidence of man-made demolition at WTC.



--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail