Group: soc.veterans
From: adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes)
Date: Friday, April 11, 2008 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: !> Former Governor Jesse Ventura Goes Public: 9-11 Was An Inside Job

In article ,
wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 18:07:45 -0800, 4033 Dead wrote:
>
>>
>>http://www2.nysun.com/article/74465?page_no=1
>>
>>U.N. Official Calls for Study Of Neocons' Role in 9/11
>>
>>By ELI LAKE
>>Staff Reporter of the Sun
>>April 10, 2008
>>A D V E R T I S E M E N T
>>A D V E R T I S E M E N T
>>
>>WASHINGTON — A new U.N. Human Rights Council official assigned to
>>monitor Israel is calling for an official commission to study the role
>>neoconservatives may have played in the September 11, 2001 terrorist
>>attacks.
>>
>>On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law
>>emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a
>>newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict
>>between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty
>>is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he
>>has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11
>>official version."
>>
>>On March 24 in an interview with a radio host and former University of
>>Wisconsin instructor, Kevin Barrett, Mr. Falk said, "It is possibly
>>true that especially the neoconservatives thought there was a
>>situation in the country and in the world where something had to
>>happen to wake up the American people. Whether they are innocent about
>>the contention that they made that something happen or not, I don't
>>think we can answer definitively at this point. All we can say is
>>there is a lot of grounds for suspicion, there should be an official
>>investigation of the sort the 9/11 commission did not engage in and
>>that the failure to do these things is cheating the American people
>>and in some sense the people of the world of a greater confidence in
>>what really happened than they presently possess."
>>
>>Mr. Barrett, who is the co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian
>>Alliance for 9/11 Truth, said in an interview yesterday of Mr. Falk,
>>"I would put him on a list of scholars who are sympathetic to the 9/11
>>truth movement."
>>
>>He added, "Unlike most public intellectuals today, he is both honest
>>and very, very knowledgeable in that he understands the probable
>>reality of 9/11. He understands that the evidence that it was a false
>>flag operation is very strong."
>>
>>The narrative that the attacks from 2001 were a "false flag" operation
>>is a recurring theme in the literature challenging the consensus that
>>19 Al Qaeda hijackers flew commercial jets into the World Trade Center
>>and the Pentagon. False flag refers to espionage or covert actions
>>taken by one government made to seem like the work of another. The
>>false flag thesis has it that the Bush administration is somehow
>>responsible for the September 11 attacks as a pretext for the wars in
>>Afghanistan and Iraq.
>>
>>Mr. Falk yesterday did not return e-mails and phone calls asking for a
>>comment. But in 2004 he wrote the foreword to the book "The New Pearl
>>Harbor," by David Ray Griffin. Mr. Griffin has posited that such an
>>inside job is the likely explanation for the attacks.
>>
>>--
>>"Now, by the way, any time you hear the United States government
>>talking
>>about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order.
>>Nothing has
>>changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists,
>>we're
>>talking about getting a court order before we do so"
>>-George W. Bush, April 20, 2004
>>
>>Not dead, in jail, or a slave? Thank a liberal!
>>Pay your taxes so the rich don't have to.
>>
>>http://www.zeppscommentaries.com
>>For news feed, http://yahoogroups/subscribe/zepps_news
>>For essays (please contribute!)
>>http:yahoogroups/subscribe/zepps_essays
>>
>>
>
>
>On 11 Apr 2008 10:55:26 -0400, adykes@panix.com (Al Dykes) wrote:
>
>>... nothing to do with WTC on 9/11...
>
>You have no awareness of that subject, bushkultie.
>



Screw Bush and the Bush administration.
Screw the "Truth Movement".
Liars, all of them.


6 years of made up shit, fraudulent quotes, and parotted opinions from
non-experts and you've still got nothing that convinces people that
know something about civil engineering, aviation, or demolition or
were eyewitnesses or were any of the estimated 70,000 first responders
and investigators of the events of 9/11 that there is anything about
what happened that required the use of man-made explosives.


--
Al Dykes
News is something someone wants to suppress, everything else is advertising.
- Lord Northcliffe, publisher of the Daily Mail

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass