soc.veterans

>In , on 03/20/2008
> at 09:55 AM, Mac said:
>

>>>In , on 03/19/2008
>>> at 05:49 AM, Mac said:
>>>
>>>On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:30:48 -0500, "Nigel Brooks"
>>>wrote:
>>>Rubbish!
>>>The system is 72 percent funded by the United States taxpayer.
>>>--
>>Nigel Brooks
>>***************************
>>> wrote in message news:aWWDj.12204$FK1.7953@trndny08...
>>posted his OPINION but, regretfully, ignored providing any PROOF when
>>he claimed the following:
>
>>> Brooks, its a better and cheaper system most people have and it works.
>>> That is the point you are avoiding.
>
>>**************************
>>>Of course there are those tales of people having to reserve Maternity
>>>Units ELEVEN MONTHS in advance... or hospitals not having certain
>>>equipment or medicine but, hey!, as you said, nothing is perfect.
>>>---Mac, the Medic
>>*****************
>>On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 08:49:45 GMT, cwapomf1@nospam.net wrote:
>
>>>Stop lying and showing us just how incredibility stupid you are mcdonnell.
>>>
>>>No one has to schedule maternity 11 months in advance, as you claim. In
>>>fact junior, no one could know 11 months in advance. And you wonder why I
>>>call you a dumbass grunt -- but here you are, proving it.
>>************************
>>No, I don't wonder why you call so many people a dumbass grunt
>>---obviously you are such a failure that you must desperately demean
>>others to enhance your own pitiful self-esteem.
>
>>I acknowledge that you had not substance and so immediately claimed I
>>was lying.... so very typical of you.
>
>>My wife and I were at a Bed&Breakfast in Canada recently and a couple
>>of the other guests worked in hospitals.
>>The woman is due to have her baby in about three months and SHE
>>related how, at her Canadian hospital, for Maternity, patients have
>>such a long wait that it is OFTEN MORE than eleven months.
>
>>Now, if you are familiar with females, sometimes one can have a high
>>probability of expecting to need Maternity care ELVEN MONTHS onward,
>>depending upon one's time and effort put into the matter... depending
>>upon how young and fertile the couple are, and, of course, the
>>"timing".
>>Unlike you, I would not be so rude or desperate as to tell the woman
>>she was lying while she related, from her own experience, an aspect of
>>Health Care in her own country.
>>---Mac, the Medic
*****************
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 10:34:12 GMT, cwapomf1@nospam.net wrote:
>
>Pay attention dumbass mcdonnell; You are talking Canada (with no proof
>to back up your bullshit). Everyone else is talking America, and a health
>care system that works for the enrollees.
>
>Now run along and hide under your truck again.
=================
Not at all Little Mr. Eddie.
You bragged that other countries had better medical plans.
I simply related a story from a woman who worked in one of the
hospitals in another country.
And, at least I had more courtesy than you and certainly did not claim
she and her husband were sprouting "bullshit".
I am so sorry that Reality offends you and causes you to spew forth
such venom.
---Mac, the Medic