soc.veterans

"Lamont Cranston" wrote in message
news:frm1ff$fv9$1@news.datemas.de...
> syvyn11 wrote:
>> "Roy Blankenship" wrote in message
>> news:13ts7u2rrbo0j7f@corp.supernews.com...
>>>
>>> "z" wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9A63E25B894Ezyadayadayada@216.196.97.131...
>>>> "syvyn11" wrote in
>>>> news:47ddec90$0$10994$d94e5ade@news.iglou.com:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> > "Sid9" wrote in message
>>>> > news:lulDj.20856$dT.4390@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>>>> >> Republicans See Storm Clouds Gathering
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Week of Bad News Highlights Difficult Challenges for GOP in Fall
>>>> >> Elections
>>>> >>
>>>> >> By Jonathan Weisman
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Washington Post Staff Writer
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Sunday, March 16, 2008; A05
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> While all eyes were on the presidential campaign and the demise
>>>> >> of New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer (D) last week, Republicans on
>>>> >> Capitol Hill were suffering a run of bad news that could hold
>>>> >> dire implications for the campaign season.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> It started with the loss last weekend of the seat held for two
>>>> >> decades by former House speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.). It
>>>> >> got worse when Republicans lost potentially strong challengers to
>>>> >> Democratic senators in South Dakota and New Jersey, and failed to
>>>> >> field anyone to oppose the reelection bid of Sen. Mark Pryor
>>>> >> (D-Ark.).
>>>> >>
>>>> > WOW!!! One governor gets caught with zipper problems and yet
>>>> > the republicans still have the bigger problem?
>>>> >
>>>> > You just don't get it. Americans see thru you libs, they
>>>> > realize that Princess Pelosi lied when she said that she would
>>>> > have the 'most ethical congress ever'. They see that the dems
>>>> > are the big money/big influence party.
>>>
>>> Are you high? Dems the "big money" party? Is that why Bush cut taxes
>>> for the
>>> rich, so the Dems could be his base? You win, you ARE the stupidest
>>> person here.
>>
>> How's the kool-aid?
>>
>> Wow, the tax cuts went to tax payers, it took millions of people off
>
> The tax cuts went to the ultra-wealthy.

Right, BECAUSE THEY PAY THE MOST TAXES!!!!!!

And it also took millions of families (not the ultra-wealthy) off the tax
rolls.

BTW, revenues to the irs went up with the tax cuts.

For the retarded libs, more money came in.

>
>
>>
>> as for the democratic plan to raise taxes to trigger a recession.
>
> There is no Democratic plan to raise taxes. There is a plan to simply let
> the tax cuts for the ultra-wealthy expire. As for a recession, we are
> already in the SECOND BUSH RECESSION.

If you make 32000 or more, you will pay more taxes. THAT'SA TAX HIKE!!!
NO RETARDEDLY GAY LIBERAL DOUBLE SPEAK. That shit is just lies, but that's
what you are good at.

>
>> It will raise taxes on those who are rich. And according to the
>> dems, if you make 32,000 a year, YOU'RE RICH!!!!
>
> According to me, you are a fucking liar.

and you are a fucking moron.

>
>>
>> Besides, it's the dems that are putting trial lawyers ahead of
>> national security. That smacks of big money and big influence to
>> me.
>
> Trial lawyers? Quit inhaling your own smoke, Shitburner.

I'll smoke you and put you in your grave motherfucker.

america don't need traitorous libs.\

>
>
>