soc.veterans

"tankfixer" wrote in message
news:MPG.225851a12a002e49989e5d@nntp.earthlink.net...
> In article <47ee7b50$0$26037$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
> dhunt@i70westnospam.com says...
>> "tankfixer" wrote in message
>> news:MPG.22580a49276b61f0989e4b@nntp.earthlink.net...
>> > In article <47edce1d$0$7274$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
>> > dhunt@i70westnospam.com says...
>> >> "tankfixer" wrote in message
>> >> news:MPG.225762dc39422f40989e41@nntp.earthlink.net...
>> >> > In article <1b8ru3dnl2fgq8vnequplpulvpf6a9hf3i@4ax.com>,
>> >> > redvet@lava.net
>> >> > says...
>> >> >> On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:29:02 -0700, tankfixer
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >In article <47ece57d$0$26086$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Ask Daryl about his claim of seeing P-38's in squadron
>> >> >> >service
>> >> >> >in the
>> >> >> >1950's and in Korea....
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm just passing through on this thread and really don't
>> >> >> know
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> players, however -
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Weren't P-38's used very early in the Korean war for photo
>> >> >> recon? -
>> >> >> redvet
>> >> >>
>> >> > No
>> >>
>> >> Because you said so. Just own up that you ain't old enough to
>> >> know that time period and there are something that you can't
>> >> find
>> >> on the Internet.
>> >
>> > You are correct that sometimes subject references might not be
>> > on
>> > the
>> > Internet.
>> > However they would still exist.
>> > I'm sure you can name a reference that would show that P-38's,
>> > or
>> > F-38's
>> > as they were called by then were used in Korea during the Korean
>> > war.
>> >
>> > I'm sure the USAF history center would love to scan them and put
>> > them
>> > here >
>> > http://www.airforcehistory.hq.af.mil/Publications/titleindex.htm
>>
>> Still on that kick, kid? You ain't old enough to have the
>> experience
>> to know that the "Official" reports are just that and have mostly
>> something to do with reality but not all.
>
> So you don't care to contribute to helping correct the official
> record ?

No one can correct an "Official" record. Maybe God or Jesus or Allah
but certainly not man.

>
>
>> >
>> > Or if nothing else Mr Baugher would love to know about it so he
>> > can
>> > update his very comprehensive site.
>> > http://home.att.net/~jbaugher1/p38.html
>>
>> Wow, that's right up there with using Wiki as a sight.
>
> I am sure Mr Baugher would disagree with you. Along with many
> others.

Read my response to Keith. You ain't gonna like it.


>
>>
>> Give it up kid. There are others that know that the "Official"
>> report is only believed by "Officials" and fools.
>
> If you can't find a published source (book, movie or whatever) to
> back
> up your claim that's ok.
> Just admit it and move on.

And you haven't come up with one single thing to back yours up. Yet
others have come in in the past and tried to correct you. So admit
you can't back up your claims and move on.






--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com