soc.veterans

snakehawk wrote:
> On Apr 7, 1:50 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
> wrote:
> > Geo wrote:
> > > On Apr 7, 2:27 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
> > > wrote:
> > >> "Docky Wocky" wrote in message
> >
> > >>news:pZsKj.16838$4O1.6503@trnddc03...
> >
> > >> > Why does the left constantly ignore Hillary's, shall we say,
> > >> > less then truthful utterences, while never failing to try to
> > >> > bury McCain?
> >
> > >> Hillary's are about inconsequential stuff -- McCain's aren't.
> >
> > > It goes to her character (or lack thereof), ethics (or lack
> > > thereof), truthfulness (or lack thereof), mental stability,
> > > willingness to say anything...and I mean anything...to get
> > > elected. Look, Hillary is a liar. She's a pathological liar. A
> > > habitual liar. An accomplished liar. She lies when there is no
> > > compelling reason to do so. She lies when the truth is easily
> > > ascertainable. It's just part of her psychological makeup. When
> > > she talks you can't believe what she's saying.
> >
> > The same can be said of McCain. McCain hasn't been the same since he
> > tongue-kissed Bush and played grab-ass with him. In addition to
> > being a compulsive liar, McCain is becoming senile and the symptoms
> > are more apparent every day. His defeat in November is a foregone
> > conclusion.
>
>
> Wow! You guys are convinced that Hillary and McCain can't win in a
> general election because they lie?

I didn't say that. Do you have reading comprehension problems?