soc.veterans

On Apr 7, 1:50=A0pm, "Lamont Cranston"
wrote:
> Geo wrote:
> > On Apr 7, 2:27 pm, "Lamont Cranston"
> > wrote:
> >> "Docky Wocky" wrote in message
>
> >>news:pZsKj.16838$4O1.6503@trnddc03...
>
> >> > Why does the left constantly ignore Hillary's, shall we say, less
> >> > then truthful utterences, while never failing to try to bury
> >> > McCain?
>
> >> Hillary's are about inconsequential stuff -- McCain's aren't.
>
> > It goes to her character (or lack thereof), ethics (or lack thereof),
> > truthfulness (or lack thereof), mental stability, willingness to say
> > anything...and I mean anything...to get elected. =A0Look, Hillary is a
> > liar. She's a pathological liar. A habitual liar. An accomplished
> > liar. =A0She lies when there is no compelling reason to do so. She lies
> > when the truth is easily ascertainable. It's just part of her
> > psychological makeup. =A0When she talks you can't believe what she's
> > saying.
>
> The same can be said of McCain. =A0McCain hasn't been the same since he
> tongue-kissed Bush and played grab-ass with him. =A0In addition to being a=

> compulsive liar, McCain is becoming senile and the symptoms are more
> apparent every day. =A0His defeat in November is a foregone conclusion.


Wow! You guys are convinced that Hillary and McCain can't win in a
general election because they lie? You think U.S. voters won't vote
for liars? Have you forgotten Bill and George? Both were known liars
yet won their second terms handily. Remember how many people voted
for Al Gore in spite of the spate of easily exposed lies.

The U.S. citizens have been conditioned to accept liars and charlatans
as public officials. They think it's cool and even a prerequisite for
holding public office. Just watch while the media deftly downplays
Obama and diverts everyone's attention away from the lies. The voters
will forget in a flash and eagerly support Hillary and McCain as their
party's candidate, lies or no lies.