soc.singles

In , kim
wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:42:58 GMT, mjc010@invalid.invalid (Mike
>Cranston here. Would you like fries to go with that shake, sir?)
>wrote:
>
>>In <15sfq39pkejskhk3kgugtnebajijsadpqh@4ax.com>, kim
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:50:55 GMT, mjc010@invalid.invalid (Mike
>>>Cranston here. Would you like fries to go with that shake, sir?)
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In , miguel
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:35:57 -0800, kim
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:30:38 -0800, miguel wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>kim wrote:
>>>>>>>>Daedalus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>miguel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>Peter Pansy:
>>>
>>>snip
>>>>>Somebody told me this picture is you with your high school debate
>>>>>team. Did you make the finals?
>>>>>
>>>>>http://dh05.anonib.org/_teensnorules/images/7679/6e5fre2.jpeg
>>>>
>>>>Nice job, pimping out your kid like that.
>>>
>>>His kid is older. That is his idea of what an underage teenaged girl
>>>is.
>>
>>That could be her pic from years ago.
>
>Regardless, any child of his has enough problems and we should move on
>from that thought.
>
>>But yeah, he tried to pass that off as a teenaged pic, whether it is or
>>not. Pedophilia is in the intent; it's the thought that counts.
>
>It's funny how he was determined to tag it to my underage years and
>not the many afterwards.
>
>>On a side note: If anyone else *ahem* had done this shit *ahem*, AUK would
>>be nominating this for KOTM. Wouldn't it be awesome to catch Charlotte
>>Blackmer walking around, on live camera, show her Mike's pedpost, and ask
>>her in front of millions of people if she would call this kook behavior or
>>not kook behavior? Can you imagine the "uh duh badebadebaduh uhmmm" that
>>would spew from her mouth then? LOL! Same for Rhonda.
>>
>>That's the thing with these cowards. They can't be nailed down on any
>>principle they profess to hold.
>
>If one doesn't have a principle, they can't be held to it.
>
>>>100% Rhonda approved.
>>
>>Rhonda could be another Wacko Jack-o setup. (Oh, those were the days, when
>>the hate machine was a real beast and not a Ford Pinto sitting on blocks
>>armed with a really loud horn...)
>
>Ya, no kidding.
>
>Mike and Rhonda are the Wal-Mart version.
>
>Oh how it pains me to think of Jax and Brenda as the Tiffany of
>trolls.
>
>But compared to what's left....
>
>>>>This has been forwarded to the FBI and to King County law enforcement.
>>>
>>>They don't care. They know he's all talk and no action.
>>
>>A whole lot of sound and fury.
>
>Well, speaking of sound and fury, went to
>http://www.uscourts.gov/bankruptcycourts/bankruptcybasics/chapter13.html
>
>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
>
>A fucking lawyer? Geez. Paycheck to paycheck.
>
>Pffffft.

What paycheck?

LOL.


miguel