soc.veterans

"P. Roehling" wrote in message
news:47deead1$0$30685$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
>
> "celtex" wrote
>
>>> Your mindless, child-like babbling tells us that you're
>>> kinda weak on facts, evidence, and rational thought, there,
>>> kooker. Believe it or not, we see that quite often from Bush
>>> parroting cartoon conspiracy kooks...
>>> Here, read what your betters have to say about WTC7's
>>> demolition and do let us know if you disagree with
>>> any of their research and facts - but try it without your
>>> mindless child-like babbling this time.
>
>> I guess you have this saved so you can just paste it in with your witty
>> lines of crap.
>
> Heh. "Witty"? Every single insult Hen3ry posts has been stolen from
> someone else who called *him* that at one point or another. Such as: when
> someone -quite likely myself- pointed out that it took a psychotic
> obsession to continue posting the same old discredited crap literally
> thousands of times, he promptly began calling anyone who dared continue
> pointing out his mistakes "psychotically obsessed".
>
> Remember the kids on the playground in 3rd grade who would reply to an
> insult with "I know you are, but what am I?" Well, Hen3ry remembers them
> too, and so far he hasn't been able to come up with anything better in
> response to his plethora of critics.
>
> You know: something like actual proof.

Heck, even when asked for a SINGLE irrefutable fact, out of all the so
called facts he claims to has. There isn't even a single one he is willing
to point to as a specific example that proves part of what he claims to be
the "truth".

Quantity doesn't equal quality, or as the saying goes if you can't dazzle
them with facts bury them in horseshit. Thus the mass data dumps hoping that
no one will notice that there are so called facts in there that contrary to
known fact, physics, and reality.