soc.veterans

"Henry" <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote in message
news:frgmgn$qm6$1@ruby.cit.cornell.edu...
> Scout wrote:
>> "Henry" <9-11@insidejob.gov> wrote in message
>>> Scout wrote:
>
>>>> Seems I was right after all.
>
>>> About what?
>
>> The fact that you couldn't present me with ONE, single solitary
>> conclusive fact that supports your claims.
>
> You're "thinking" of a conspiracy kook who uses
> the handle "Scout". You have yet to provide even
> one link to one photo or video, or one link to even
> one expert research paper.



I hereby accept your admission that you don't have even a single fact that
you are confident enough in to present it by itself to establish that there
is at least one specific, concrete piece of evidence that supports your
claims.

Since you lack such faith in your "evidence", then I see no need to waste my
time attempting to see if the multitudes of claims and evidence presented in
mass really do support what you claim, or if they are silly claims which
sound good but can't stand close examination.

Like the assertion that steel is unaffected by the heat from a fire and that
such a fire would have no impact on structural steel. It does. The fact it
does is why fire resistant coatings are a code requirement in any steel
framed structure larger than a single family residential home. Indeed we
witnessed a good example of this out in CA where a tanker truck caught fire
under an overpass what used structural steel beams for it's support. Even
though the fire was a limited burn of hydrocarbon fuel (like jet fuel is)
the bridge was deemed structurally compromised and unsafe for further use
until demolished and replaced with a new bridge.

As a person trying to convince others that what he says is true, you seem
highly reluctant to do anything more than fling insults and post a mass dump
of cut n' paste that you assert supports your claims. If you can't work with
someone who is asking you to show that what you say is true by doing so in a
reasonable manner, then why should anyone bother with you?