soc.veterans

On Sat, 5 Apr 2008 13:02:16 -0400, "Al E. Crocodile"
wrote:

>
>"tankfixer" wrote in message
>news:MPG.226144d3d82083ca989edc@nntp.earthlink.net...
>> In article <_6GdndVR8b9Oz2ranZ2dnUVZ_r2nnZ2d@comcast.com>,
>> Al@CrocsBiteaHillBillyToday.com says...
>>> I think Generals Eisenhower,Macarthur also retired more than 20
>>> years ago, or are you just another stupid hillbilly running his ignorant,
>>> useless, non achieving, losing,failing mouth
>>
>> Go ahead and trot them out to testify in front of Congress then...
>> If you think thier testimony supports your case.
>> I won't bother to wait though
>
>LMAO, that simple and feeble mind is straining again goober,
>
>Congress doesn't need any testimony, they know the truth, they only put
>those lying hillbillies up there so the American people can see the liars in
>action,
>
They absolutely NEED & LOVE testimony. Nothing rocks their little man
in the boat more then hearing from somebody that reaffirms what they
already believe, regardless of if it is the "truth" or not.

Now while a withdrawal is most a foregone conclusion, the big question
that hasn't been answered is the how, what & when of it.

The withdrawal has definitely got to be better thoughtful & planned
then the entry was (the entry plan should have actually included an
exit strategy), or we will just either end up back there or dealing
with an even bigger mess when the shit completely falls apart.

Personally our best hope for stability is to prop back up a Dictator
who we can control, and who can control the citizenry via the "Boot on
the Neck" methodology which is the only thing that is going to work
there.

Now of course you can reply with your typical ad hominem argument
and/or attack, but that only reflects poorly on you, not me.

BTW -- If you actually had the ability to put forward a intelligent
and well thought-out reply the majority of readers here would probably
have a Heart Attack and die.
--
"Before all else, be armed" -- Machiavelli