soc.veterans

Henry wrote:
> Dave Bugg wrote:
>> Henry wrote:
>>> Dave Bugg wrote:
>>>> Henry wrote:
>
>>>>> Did you "learn" that everyone who lives in Iran is a
>>>>> terrorist from the same source you "learned" that Iraq
>>>>> was about to nuke the U.S. - until King George saved
>>>>> us all from eminent doom?
>
>>>> Please give us a verifiable cite in which Bush EVER said that Iraq
>>>> "was aabout to nuke the U.S."
>
>>>> We'll all wait.
>
>>> http://refugia.org/bush/bushrefs.htm
>
>>> 1. President Bush repeatedly lied about Iraq's nuclear threat
>
>>> In 10/2/02 Bush warned, "Facing clear evidence of peril, we cannot
>>> wait for the final proof, the smoking gun that could come in the
>>> form of a mushroom cloud."
>
>> Too bad your lack of reading comprehension fails to put that
>> statement in its proper context.
>
> Too bad your "mind" is so weak that you lack
> the intelligence, honesty, and integrity to admit
> when you've been proven wrong.

Since I can admit to being wrong, you've painted with the inappropriate
brush. You've offered NO proof whatsoever; you've only proffered
speculations. Speculations to which refutation by reputable scienctists,
mechanical engineers, chemists, and physicists was complete. The fact that
you fail to grasp the difference between 'proof' and 'speculation' is
telling. It is one of the biggest markers of a k00k.

I have no idea whether or not you are honest and have integrity; even k00ks
can be honest and hard-working and generous. The question of your
intelligence may or may not be at issue either. There are lots of
intelligent folks who have never received an adequate education which would
enable them to put there intelligence on a higher critical thinking path.

That may be what you are: a good, intelligent person who simply was no get
the opportunity to develop his critical thinking skills.

>The comical back
> pedaling and weaseling of mindless Bush apologist
> doesn't change the facts, but it does make you
> look ignorant, foolish, and dishonest.

Two things wrong with that statement:
1. I intensly dislike Bush, so I've never tried to justify the man.
2. You seem to misunderstand what the term 'backpeddle' means.

I guess I was wrong about you. Not only are you a sad example of the
floatsom of humanity, but are as stupid as a sack of rocks to boot.