On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 08:47:18 -0700 (PDT), asterisc
wrote:
>Alright man, let's do it another way.
>Try this:
>http://pastebin.com/d43068295
The following C++ version is slightly faster (at least it compiles
both on g++ and MC9)
http://pastebin.com/f222d2344