soc.veterans

On 6 Apr, 15:38, Wolfie wrote:
> parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > On 5 Apr, 15:47, Wolfie wrote:
> >> William Black wrote:
> >>> "Wolfie" wrote in message
> >>>news:maOdnT0jcpFm6WranZ2dnUVZ_rrinZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>>> William Black wrote:
> >>>>> "Wolfie" wrote in message
> >>>>>news:PvKdnU-J3qbzQWvanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>>>>> William Black wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Wolfie" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>news:htmdnR_J7Ix0FmvanZ2dnUVZ_j2dnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>>>>>>> William Black wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> "Wolfie" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>news:gc6dnZEcSuYb0WvanZ2dnUVZ_rignZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>>>>>>>>> William Black wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> "Wolfie" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>>news:4OudnfMJwebZrGvanZ2dnUVZ_rzinZ2d@comcast.com...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I doubt any British serviceman with as wide an experience as that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> would have escaped exposure to the M16 family.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> PRECISELY YOU FOOL!!!!
> >>>>>>>>>>> So which army where you in?
> >>>>>>>>>> I suddenly noticed I forgot one that should have gone
> >>>>>>>>>> along with the Spanish MG-42 - the HK G3.
> >>>>>>>>> South African or Israeli.
> >>>>>>>> Vive le Mort, Vive Le Guerre....?
> >>>>>>>> Know how that ends?
> >>>>>>> Oh gawd, not another one.
> >>>>>>> Put the words 'Highlander' into a Usenet search and swap lies with that
> >>>>>>> old twonk.
> >>>>>>>>> Certainly not British, they rejected the G3 because it doesn't shoot
> >>>>>>>>> a proper full power round.
> >>>>>>>> Bollocks. It's about how much charge you put in the cartridges
> >>>>>>>> and whether the breech can take the pressure. It shoots full charge
> >>>>>>>> Nato 7,62 just fine.
> >>>>>>> Nope, the rolling ball semi blowback action won't take it, as the
> >>>>>>> Brits found out when they were playing with them in the Falklands.
> >>>>>>> The Foreign Legion ones are CETME anyway...
> >>>>>>http://youtube.com/watch?v=yo0v6q9HOoE
> >>>>> How dare you.
> >>>>> A man who claims to have been a mercenary in the service of a foreign
> >>>>> power.
> >>>>> Crass Hypocrisy.
> >>>> Except that I would have and still would fight and die to save her throne.
> >>>> Something you would never do.
> >>> With your views you're probably unacceptable.
> >>> Try saying "Of course the Germans never did gas any Jews' and see how far
> >>> you get in the UK today.
> >> Only you have said that. I never have.
>
> > You merely said it was impossible and discounted all evidence for gas
> > chambers without even examining it.
>
> >> So you place words in mouth
> >> that are not mine and lie about all kinds of crap including
> >> the nitro proof mark on my .45 barrel. No apology, just lies.
> >> Like you're a little Lord Haw Haw with a megaphone...
>
> > You don't make any sense, Wolfy. You do know that, don't you?
>
> Refresh my memory:

No problem. For example, you seem bemused that a concentration of 300
ppm of HCN can be achieved in a building, but don't find it odd that
Degesach recommended using it to delouse non-airtight structures sush
as tents, even though delousing requires a concentration several
hundred times higher.

You also believe analaysing a mass grave, half a football pitch in
area and sevearl meters deep, filled with mixed, crushed and cremated
ermains, in order to find out how many different bodies are there s

>
> Where did Hitler say Jews must be exterminated (killed) in Mein Kampf?

How do you translate "ausrotten"?


>
> Secondly, here's a really tough one - why was Feldmarschal
> Gerd von Rundstedt not found quilty of anything at Nuremburg?
>
> Also, what was Alfred Jodl found guilty of?
>
> --
> Wolfie

TRY and stick to the point, Wolfy - what does that have to do with
your bizarre refusal to even examine the rather compelling evidence
for gas chambers?

BTW - afre you suspicious of the Roma/Sinti deaths too? Or just the
Jewish ones? Note that "Josef Mengele" isn't a logical answer ;-)

THanks for the help!
Your pal
/PK