soc.veterans

parris_k@yahoo.com wrote:
> On 31 Mar, 14:00, Wolfie wrote:
>> parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> On 30 Mar, 23:14, Wolfie wrote:
>>>> parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>> On 30 Mar, 21:04, Wolfie wrote:
>>>>>> parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>> On 30 Mar, 17:25, Wolfie wrote:
>>>>>>>> parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 30 Mar, 16:14, Wolfie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> parri...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 30 Mar, 14:02, Wolfie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wolfie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Paul Hovnanian P.E. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maxden...@lycos.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 22, 12:40 am, "Ben H. Cramer" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Article contributed by a fan in Finnnnnnnnlannnnnd.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did the Allies and Jews lie about the Holocaust?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nearly everyone has heard of Auschwitz, the German wartime concentration
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> camp where many prisoners -- most of them Jewish -- were reportedly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exterminated, especially in gas chambers. Auschwitz is widely regarded as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the most terrible Nazi extermination center. The camp's horrific reputation
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cannot, however, be reconciled with the facts.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Occam's Razor: The simplest explanations tend to be correct.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Unless you can produce some evidence that explains how and why the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Allies would manufacture evidence like photos of thousands of corpses in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass graves and the method by which they managed to recruit emaciated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> actors to produce film of what appears to be concentration camp
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> survivors, I'm going to figure that these constitute valid evidence
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supporting the Holocaust.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have to admit though that with ground searching radar,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dna testing and cadaver sniffing dogs, very few bodies have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> found and that the ability of the Nazis to totally obliterate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6 million people is unfeasible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Very few? Have you seen the photos of the mass graves? The 6 million
>>>>>>>>>>>>> figure is quite believable.
>>>>>>>>>>>> So how many bodies have been discovered in mass graves? You know,
>>>>>>>>>>>> the kind of crime scene investigation that we normally do
>>>>>>>>>>>> at sites in Bosnia, Ruanda or even Katyn Forest.'
>>>>>>>>>>> When you have a n area the size of a football pitch and sevearl meters
>>>>>>>>>>> deep filled with charred human remains it can get a bit tricky working
>>>>>>>>>>> out how many people are actually there.
>>>>>>>>>> Not really. Forensic science is quite adept at that.
>>>>>>>>>> You dig up the entire place and start counting and matching bones
>>>>>>>>>> and take DNA samples from everything you find. Simple.
>>>>>>>>> Here's an abstract of an investigation of 61 people from 6 "mass"
>>>>>>>>> graves, a year and a half after the event:
>>>>>>>> 61 people? Are you serious? We're talking about up
>>>>>>>> to 6 million aren't we?
>>>>>>>> What's this "61" crap?
>>>>>>> I was giving an example of just how difficult it is to investigate
>>>>>>> mass graves using "DNA samples" (amongst myriad other things)
>>>>>>> Something you asserted was "simple" and "routine".
>>>>>>> And that was with a grave that wasn't mixed up, cremated remains..
>>>>> Well? Abandoned this angle, have you?
>>> Well? Still convinced it's a "simple" job for the DNA experts?
>>> Or are you hoping this will go away? :-)
>> No, I'm waiting to hear more tripe on why you don't
>> want to know who is criminally buried in mass graves
>> like even those in Ruanda do.
>
> You're lying again - I merely pointed out that investigating a mass
> grave of mixed, cremated remains is a rather daunting prospect. You,
> on the other hand, believe it is "simple"

Check with Kathy Reichs, she made a career out of it,
wrote books and even has a TV series about called Bones.


--
Wolfie