On Nov 29, 1:14 pm, "Victor Bazarov"
> matt.elk...@gmail.com wrote:
> > [..problem arising auto_ptr's not overloading operator->* ..]
> > This long-winded preamble (apologies) brings me to my
> > question: was this overload intentionally left out of std::auto_ptr,
> > or is it an oversight (or is it actually in there and just an
> > oversight in the implementation)? If intentional, what was the
> > rationale? If not intentional, what the odds we will see it in the
> > next Standard?
>
> The correct place to ask those questions would be 'comp.std.c++'
> where they discuss the standardisation process, rationales, what
> goes into the next one, etc.
>
> AFAIK, auto_ptr (and its variations) provides no overload for ->*
> (as per the Standard).
>
> V
> --
> Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
> I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
Apologies, I'll do so.