sci.physics.electromag

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(snipped)
> Also, I see in the news as of recently, Brookhaven having found some
> materials superconduct
> in the 2dimensional plane but do not superconduct 3D overall. So a
> material can superconduct
> in a 2nd dimension but not superconduct in 3rd dimension. To me that
> is more supporting evidence
> that superconduction is merely a Capacitor current for 2nd dimension
> is capacitors.
>

Some news out of Brookhaven about the stripes in superconduction
and that a material can be superconductive in 2D but not
superconductive
overall in 3D. A researcher by the name of Qiang Li has reported on
this
new findings. But I could see what the actual material they were using

To me, a directional dependence of the electron transport system means
the material is a capacitor. A parallel plate capacitor for those are
systems
of 2nd dimension.

I did some further searching to see whether anyone divulges what the
material
that Qiang Li reports about. I found the below but I seriously doubt
that the
CeRhIn5 is the material that Qiang Li is reporting about. But it does
show that
alot of news over 2D versus 3D of superconduction materials.

--- quoting Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4986 - 4989 (2000)
[Issue 21 - May 2000]

Pressure-Induced Superconductivity in Quasi-2D CeRhIn5

H. Hegger , C. Petrovic , E. G. Moshopoulou, M. F. Hundley, J. L.
Sarrao, Z. Fisk, and J. D. Thompson
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545
Received 22 November 1999

CeRhIn5 is a new heavy-electron material that crystallizes in a
quasi-2D structure that can be
viewed as alternating layers of CeIn3 and RhIn2 stacked sequentially
along the tetragonal c axis.
Application of hydrostatic pressure induces a first-order-like
transition from an unconventional
antiferromagnetic state to a superconducting state with Tc = 2.1 K.

--- end quoting Phys. Rev. Lett.

I suspect this flood of news about 2D versus 3D superconductivity is
all supporting evidence
in favor of the idea that Superconductivity is equal to a Capacitor
Current.

And the crux of this theory is that when a material is
superconductive, merely means that the
electrons are far away from the ground state orbital but no matter how
far away electrons are,
they orbit their nucleus with no resistance and no friction for that
is what Quantum Mechanics
is all about-- electrons in orbit never lose energy, and they merely
go to different orbitals.

A DC current has resistance and also a AC current, but a Capacitor-
Current is a bit different from
a DC or AC current. A Capacitor Current has its electrons moving at
nearly the speed of light
and they are moving without resistance because they are merely in an
electron orbital of Quantum
Mechanics.

So, superconductivity was never really a hard or difficult puzzle to
solve. It was merely the recognition
that physics had more than just two different types of currents and
had a third type of current--
Capacitor Current.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies