Group: sci.physics.electromag
From: a_plutonium
Date: Thursday, February 28, 2008 9:56 PM
Subject: #84 Experiments showing that Capacitor Currents creates a Meissner Effect; new textbook: "How Superconductivity really works; nanosecond Capacitor discharge current"

Alright, as promised I would tell of the experiments of such:

(1) Wimshurst Generator current producing a Meissner type effect of
diamagnetism
(2) DC current yielding no effect to outside magnet
(3) AC current yielding no effect to outside magnet

So far my three above experiments are too crude to detail and I am not
satisfied myself with the
setup tables of the three. Trouble is the imprecision of my
measurement of current and the effect
of the magnet on the current.

So I am going to have to stall on reporting detailed accurate data and
can only report these
preliminary findings.

My trouble is when saying "no effect" may be due to the imprecision of
my measuring devices.

My preliminary findings are that there exists a effect of a outside
magnet on a "rather continuous
Wimshurst current" I would like to get a elaborate Wimshurst Generator
that is able to produce
what I call an "almost continuous current." I do not need a nanosecond
gap in current and would
be happy with much larger gaps in current.

So what I have found preliminarily is that there is a diamagnetic
effect or the Meissner Effect on
a Capacitor current from a Wimshurst Generator.

From my crude setup so far on the DC and AC current when a outside
magnet is applied there
was no effect on my instrument but that could be because my instrument
was too crude to
register an effect.

So in summary, my experiments so far have revealed that a Capacitor
Current is a superconduction
current because it displays a diamagnetism. And that a AC current or
DC current are nondiamagnetic.

By several more weeks I should have more information on these
experiments.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies