sci.physics.electromag

In a previous post I said that if Onnes in 1911 had sat down and
reflected for a moment that magnetism
is really nothing more than the fact that electrons in motion in atoms
are perpetual motion machines
that never lose energy. This is the Quantum Physics of Nature. Quantum
Mechanics is nothing but a
big term that is tantamount to the idea that electrons in atoms as
they orbit atoms are perpetual motion machines.
Yes. Constantly in motion and never losing energy, that is what
electrons are. Friction free. No resistance.

So when Onnes discovered that frozen mercury at 4 Kelvin yielded a No
Resistance Current, if Onnes had
realized that magnetism also is No Resistance. That the world has
Permanent Magnets.

How can the world have Permanent Magnets? Again, because electrons are
perpetual motion machines
that never lose energy.

So, if Onnes had sat down and tied together those two ideas. The idea
that his current in frozen
mercury yielded friction free or resistance free current and tied that
with permanent magnets are
friction free or resistance free. Onnes would have recognized that
Superconductivity is a special and
different type of current from DC.

So if you feed a DC current into mercury at 4 Kelvin you end up with a
Capacitor or Superconductor
Current.

If you align the electrons in paramagnetism you end up with
ferromagnetism.

If you feed AC current into mercury at 4 Kelvin, you again change that
current into a Capacitor Current.

What is funny and laughable about the history of physics, now, is how
simple the explanation
of superconductivity was. How laughable it is that thousands of
trained physicists ran off with bizarre
and exotica explanations such as electrons attracting other electrons
as a Cooper pair. How laughable
because all that time there was Permanent Magnets in almost every home
in the world where these
magnets have No Resistance.

That permanent magnets are SuperMagnetism.

And if the world has SuperMagnetism of objects that never lose energy
and of objects that have
no friction and have no resistance. Then why did it take from 1911
until 2008 for anyone to raise and
discuss this bold and plain common fact?

If there is SuperMagnetism and there is Superconductivity, then the
two are related and they are
related by the fact that the motion of electrons in atoms is friction
free. That means a DC current or
AC current that enters a perovskite superconductor or lead at 7 K or
mercury at 4 Kelvin turn into
a Capacitor Current. That DC and AC currents as they enter a
superconductor material turn into
a different current.

It is truly astounding that the history of science would uncover
Quantum Mechanics from 1900 to
1930, but in the time frame of 1911 to 2008, only one person saw that
Superconductivity was
the symmetrical dual of SuperMagnetism in that a common Permanent
Magnet explains
superconductivity. Amazing that we can discover the Schrodinger Wave
Equation by 1930 but
that it takes us 97 years to understand a Permanent Magnet is the same
as Superconductivity.
In one stroke of 30 years we are brilliant, in another stroke of 97
years we are blithering stupid.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies