Group: sci.physics.electromag
From: Archimedes Plutonium
Date: Saturday, April 05, 2008 3:03 AM
Subject: #122 if Onnes had started with Supermagnetism he would have solved Superconductivity also; new textbook: "How Superconductivity really works; nanosecond Capacitor discharge current"

Now what I have done in the past several days is compare three chemical
bonds with three currents in physics. Now I am ready to do the most
beautiful comparison of all. Comparing three Magnetisms with three
Bonds with three Currents. They are all related or interrelated.

Onnes discovered Superconductivity circa 1911 when he froze mercury
to 4 degrees Kelvin and found that an electric current has no
resistance. But should that have surprized the world of science
and the world at large. Not really, because the world of science
had something known back to prehistory which was even more amazing
than superconductivity in 1911. I am going to call it SuperMagnetism.

Most people know supermagnetism and have seen it in everyday life. It
is so common that we lost sight and understanding of what it really is.

Like superconductivity, supermagnetism depends on temperature and the
colder one has a magnet, the better it is a supermagnetism. So we can
even consider a Transition temperature for SuperMagnetism.

Supermagnetism is simply the ferromagnets we have in our homes and
in many appliances.

Superconductivity is conductivity with no resistance. Well, magnetism
is a constant EM field and it has "no resistance"

Why do both have "no resistance"? It is because both are the same
phenomenon of electrons in motion which have no friction nor resistance
when moving from one orbital of an atom to another orbital. Electrons
are perpetual motion entities of no resistance. Magnetism is a dual
of Electricity.

And just because in 1911 we see Conductivity of electricity with no
resistance, we foolishly ignored or never understood that there is
magnetism without resistance.

So the world has Superconductivity, but we should have realized back in
1911, that if the world has Superconductivity of electric field that the
world has SuperMagnetism of the magnetic field.

And Supermagnetism is ferromagnetism.

And since the world has Supermagnetism, means that the theory of
Superconductivity and Supermagnetism are dual aspects of a special type
of current of physics-- the Capacitor Current.

I did a Chart of the physics currents:

DC

AC

Capacitor Current

I did a Chart of the chemistry bonds:

Ionic

Covalent

Metallic

Now I do a chart of the chemistry magnetisms:

Paramagnetic as matter that contains unpaired electrons

Diamagnetic as matter where all of its electrons are paired

Ferromagnetic is paramagnetic only where there is alignment of magnetic
moments.

So now, what if Onnes back in 1911 had discovered superconductivity
and then said, well, the world has Supermagnetism in the form of
ferromagnets where there is "no resistance". Thus, Superconductivity
is a symmetry of SuperMagnetism and that means that a special type
of current exists that is different from the DC current applied by
Onnes back in 1911. If Onnes had reasoned that chain of logic, he
could have discovered not only superconductivity, but the true theory
of what Superconductivity is !!

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies