Group: sci.physics.electromag
From: "Autymn D. C."
Date: Tuesday, March 04, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: #88 micro-explanation of superconduction and resistance; new textbook: "How Superconductivity really works; nanosecond Capacitor discharge current"

On Mar 3, 10:15=A0am, a_plutonium wrote:
> I believe the answer is that of asking how can you have electron
> motion that never has
> friction or resistance? Electrons orbiting atoms are forever in motion
> with never any
> resistance or friction. Now if someone wants more than this, well,
> there is no more detail
> or elaboration. There is no common example in life of a perpetual
> motion machine that is the
> electron in orbiting around an atom forever without friction or
> resistance.

You don't read and heed my posts, shitheaded retard.

http://google.com/groups?q=3DAutymn+persistent

El=E8ctrostatic levitation-repulsion of hair doesn't work when loft is
damp and briny, which is when currents [magnetic] are greatest, so you
Archimedes are as assbackwards and retarded as Androcles in
relativity. Now shut your brainshitting or these usenetters will help
me find where you Ludwig are so I can smash your muttey head in.

Silver's el=E8ctronic mobility is greater than copper's. It's also a
better reflector-rejector of radio, microwave, and infrared. Its
better conductivity should be the same wherefore as sodium's,
calcium's, and aluminium's are better than their overelements'
conductivity, as well as beryllium's over helium's--nuclear shielding.

http://google.com/groups?q=3DAutymn+palladium+rhodium

They must find out how these metals behave in a field of ozone or
monoxygen.

kelvins, not Kelvin, innumerate cretin

-Aut

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass