sci.physics.electromag

On Mar 1, 1:16=A0pm, Archimedes Plutonium
wrote:
> Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> > Alright, as promised I would tell of the experiments of such:
>
> > (1) Wimshurst Generator current producing a Meissner type effect of
> > diamagnetism
> > (2) DC current yielding no effect to outside magnet
> > (3) AC current yielding no effect to outside magnet
>
> > So far my three above experiments are too crude to detail and I am not
> > satisfied myself with the
> > setup tables of the three. Trouble is the imprecision of my
> > measurement of current and the effect
> > of the magnet on the current.
>
> > So I am going to have to stall on reporting detailed accurate data and
> > can only report these
> > preliminary findings.
>
> > My trouble is when saying "no effect" may be due to the imprecision of
> > my measuring devices.
>
> > My preliminary findings are that there exists a effect of a outside
> > magnet on a "rather continuous
> > Wimshurst current" I would like to get a elaborate Wimshurst Generator
> > that is able to produce
> > what I call an "almost continuous current." I do not need a nanosecond
> > gap in current and would
> > be happy with much larger gaps in current.
>
> > So what I have found preliminarily is that there is a diamagnetic
> > effect or the Meissner Effect on
> > a Capacitor current from a Wimshurst Generator.
>
> > From my crude setup so far on the DC and AC current when a outside
> > magnet is applied there
> > was no effect on my instrument but that could be because my instrument
> > was too crude to
> > register an effect.
>
> > So in summary, my experiments so far have revealed that a Capacitor
> > Current is a superconduction
> > current because it displays a diamagnetism. And that a AC current or
> > DC current are nondiamagnetic.
>
> > By several more weeks I should have more information on these
> > experiments.
>
> In the book "Quantum Generations" by Helge Kragh, 1999, in the chapter
> on the history of superconductivity, he keeps talking about wanting
> the Micro-explanation of the physics involved in superconduction. Around
> the pages of 376, Kragh outlines the Macro physics of the Meissner
> Effect and talks about the history of the London brothers with their
> shortcomings because their theory is Macro physics, not a Micro physics
> explanation.
>
> Well, if I am correct that superconductivity is Capacitor Current, then
> superconduction does not really belong in a history of Quantum Mechanics
> as a strange and exotic piece of Quantum Strangeness that the BCS theory
> turns out to be. Superconduction as a Capacitor Current ends up being
> a part of physics that would be more apt and appropriate as a extension
> of Maxwell theory and Maxwell Equations. We do not need bizarre and
> strange and exotica explanations for "no resistance" as Cooper pairing
> of electrons and that of phonons.
>
> So how does Superconductivity =3D Capacitor Current explain the Micro
> physics? Good question, but an easy one to answer. Remember in Quantum
> Mechanics that the electron never experiences friction or resistance in
> energy but is forever
> "quantum energetic". That as an electron orbits an atom it is forever
> resistance-free or friction-free. This is what Quantum Mechanics is all
> about in the first place, in that there is no friction or resistance of
> electron in motion around an atom. Yes, of course, the electron can gain
> or lose energy and jump orbits, except for the ground state electron
> cannot go lower. But jumping orbits is the Quantum of Quantum Mechanics
> and what is different about Quantum Mechanics from the old Classical
> Mechanics is that the electron never experiences what in Classical
> Physics we think of as Resistance or Friction.
>
> Enough of a prep lecture.
>
> Now think of Superconductivity. How do we have a phenomenon of
> Superconduction with no resistance, no friction involved? Well, since
> a electron never has resistance or friction in its orbits of atoms
> we have a case where electrons in flow motion simply have a current
> instead of jumping from quantum levels in atoms. The explanation of
> the Micro physics of superconductivity is simply that electrons never
> have resistance or friction.
>
> In a normal conduction such as AC current or DC current, those currents
> are not electrons in motion of quantum levels as friction or resistance
> free. AC and DC currents in conductors is a transfer of energy which
> has much room for resistance and friction. But a Capacitor Current that
> originates from electrons to atoms is a current that is the Quantum
> Mechanics free of resistance and free of friction.
>
> As others begin to confirm the above experiment that Capacitor Currents
> of a Wimshurst Generator yield the Meissner Effect, and that lightning
> bolts in Nature are also Superconduction Currents, then we begin to
> fill in the holes and gaps of Maxwell theory and of Physics at large,
> for the twisted and convoluted history of superconduction theory is
> really a correction of the old physics in that they were not bright
> enough to realize physics had more than one type of electric-current.
>
> All the physics textbooks prior to 2008, all of them assume physics
> has but one and only one type of current. This is a horrible assumption
> and even very much laughable, considering that those same physics
> and chemistry textbooks talk about various different types of magnetism
> such as paramagnetism, ferromagnetism, diamagnetism, yet they still talk
> about only one type of Electric current. And chemistry talks about at
> least three different types of bonds in chemistry, yet laughably, it
> never dawned on them that currents would come in different types.
>
> Archimedes Plutoniumwww.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Electrons orbiting like planets has been replaced by being a cloud.
This is not making Eddington very happy,but it is a better theory.
Seems electrons have a "smearing effect,and only a cloud can give this
view Bert+Sunbeam