sci.physics.electromag

"a_plutonium" wrote in message
news:511d9bde-454b-4105-a0ab-446c0212fb02@34g2000hsz.googlegroups.com...
>
> Another test of Capacitor Superconduction theory would be to hook up
> or parallel series a bunch of superconductors.
>
> Suppose Superconduction is truly Capacitors that charge in a
> nanosecond and then discharge in another
> nanosecond. Now all capacitors are not the same and one capacitor will
> charge faster than another.
> So if the Capacitor theory is correct then a superconduction current
> in say one perovskite that is
> hooked-up to a different perovskite superconductor would buildup and
> discharge differently. And
> so we should notice some resonance or dissonance or incompatibility.
>
> So one can easily imagine a resonance of dissimilar superconductors
> hooked up in
> series.
>
> Maybe some researchers have already connected different
> superconductors in a circuit and
> noticed some remarkable results.
>
> If other theories such as Cooper pairing and BCS were correct there
> should be no remarkable results,
> and be no resonance.
>
> I call it resonance but it may have a better term to describe this
> circumstance.
>
> Archimedes Plutonium
> www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
> whole entire Universe is just one big atom
> where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
When you speak of capacitor current I believe you are speaking of
longitudinal wave current, but the rest is quite beyond me. I know as much
about super conductance as I do about my sister's mental processes, which on
a scale of ten doesn't even move the meter.
Regards,
Vince