Group: sci.physics.particle
From: "Y.y.Porat"
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 1:38 AM
Subject: Re: Work = energy?

On Feb 20, 7:20=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:08 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 4:34 pm, pmb wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 3:12 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 17, 10:42 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > [...]
>
> > > > Why is it so difficult for you to understand that E=3Dmc^2 is a limi=
ting
> > > > case?
>
> > > Dear Eric
>
> > > I don't understand this comment. What do you mean when you say that
> > > "E=3Dmc^2 is a limiting case?" Thank you.
>
> > > Pete
>
> > ---------------
> > eric is unable to do some reading between the lines:
>
> > it is not only an abstract limit case!
> > it has some other conclusions :
>
> > if E=3Dmc^2 for the photon
> > it means that the photon CAN =A0move at c !
> > and a firther conclusion:
>
> > the photon is an exception cace to the rule that
> > no mass can reach c
> > (the mass of the photon can reach c as an exception =A0case)
>
> > and even an additional insight :
> > THERE IS JUST ONE KIND OF MASS!
> > no matter how youcall it
> > just one kind of mass
>
> > all the 'other masses' were an invension of
> > amthematiciance who didt undersand =A0the masic of physics
> > and could not grasp tha teach physics formula of eqaution
> > has its limits of validatio
> > and they could not immagine that the rule
> > of
> > no mass canreach c doe snot include the mass
> > of the photon
> > 2
> > they could not understand that
> > =A0NO MASS NO REAL PHYSICS !!
>
> > =A0(which should be one of the basics of physics
> > and a more powerful 'lithmus paper' to examine
> > quickly if a theory makes physics sense
> > or jsut a fairy tale =A0! =A0(spelling for 'tale ' =A0taile ?? )
> > ie nonsens physics
> > anyway
> > =A0years later =A0even Gisse =A0 &Co will get it
> > but he wil claime that that is** his** innovation.. =A0(:-)
>
> > ATB
> > Y.Porat
> > ----------------------
>
> What a blithering idiot. You still don't get that E =3D mc^2 isn't valid
> for moving objects.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-----------------
imbecil parrot
so what is that c there??

have you heared about
INTRINSIC MOVEMENT ??

doe s a little fucker like you what toteachme
about the structure of matter and energy
and mass problems ??
just whipe out the milk from your stupid arrogant face

ATB
Y.Porat

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass