sci.physics.particle

On Mar 27, 8:12=A0am, kenseto wrote:
> On Mar 26, 3:43=A0pm, Randy Poe wrote:
>
> > On Mar 26, 4:18 pm, kenseto wrote:
> > Ken says:
>
> > > Assertion is not a valid arguement.
>
> > And then immediately asserts:
>
> > > The grating does define a
> > > universal wavelength for every light source at rest in its own frame.
>
> > Assertion is not a valid argument, Ken. No matter how
> > many times you say this, it is not going to cause anybody
> > using diffraction gratings to actually use them this way.
>

Assertion 1:
> What I said is not assertion.

Assertion 2: (This one without any support whatsoever)
> The grating defines a universal
> wavelength for every light source at rest wrt it. The incoming light
> becomes a new light source in the grating's frame and a new universal
> length is defined for it by the grating.