sci.physics.particle

On Feb 26, 4:08=A0pm, "chu...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Feb 25, 4:02 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 25, 6:30 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 25, 5:16 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 25, 12:17 pm, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 24, 11:37 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > On Feb 25, 9:16 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On Feb 24, 9:28 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > On Feb 24, 11:25 pm, "chu...@gmail.com" w=
rote:
>
> > > > > > > > > Ok...so I've been wondering how on earth does gravity bend=
light, I
> > > > > > > > > mean I read all about how Einstein's General Relativity de=
scribes
> > > > > > > > > space-time, and when there's a mass in space-time it creat=
es a
> > > > > > > > > curve(Bowling ball on a sheet or something), and that curv=
e is
> > > > > > > > > Gravity, and when light passes through the curve it bends.=
...but why?
>
> > > > > > > > --------------------
> > > > > > > > just forget about curved spacetime
> > > > > > > > light bends next topthe sun
> > > > > > > > becuase of the most simple reason
> > > > > > > > LIGHT HAS MASS !!!
>
> > > > > > > You are amazingly sure of this despite not having one shred of=

> > > > > > > evidence to support your claim. Then again, it is more importa=
nt to be
> > > > > > > original than be right, eh?
>
> > > > > > > > (even Einstein ddint know to read his momentous formula
>
> > > > > > > > E=3Dmc^2
>
> > Lol..Porat just because m is multiplying c - speed of light does not
> mean they are connected. it just means that if a mass is accelerated
> to the speed of light it would require so so Energy(in Theory) but of
> course we all know that its not possible in the real world(yet!).- Hide qu=
oted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

----------------
just learn how a physical formula is created and used!!

if it is mc^2 and it is mc^2 !!!!!

it is not just m and just c^2
you cant separate them
IT IS THE COMBINATION OF THEM THAT MAKES
IT A SPECIAL FORMULA and a physical ENTITY !!

m i ssomething and c is something elses
only the combination of themmakes them
a specific physical entity
(just see how croocked mimded people can be
if locked on some concept (no mass to the photon.

while m there is jsut before their eys !!!)
they aave no proplem to castrate a formula
from its ingrediants !!)
such a behaviour fits betetr crooked lawyers
not physicists
sorry if i sound rude
i have nothing personal against you
at least untill now ...........
btw
just for you inforamtion:
not long ago
physicists admitted that the formula MUST
iclude mass (they had no choice butr to admit )
but they had a croooked explanation
they saied 'yes it has mass' but .....
it is a new kind of mass !!
(why ..?? becuase we aave to adjust it to their (stoopid)
understanding that
no mass can reach c !! (:-)
why ??
because we know from experience that (as you say)
as speed growes it becomes more difficuly
to add more velocity
but they were not cleaver and knwlegable
to understand that the above fact is not
because mass is swelling'
but because trhe
FASTEST FORCE AGENT CANNOT TARVEL FASTER THAN
ITS MAXIMUM VELOCITY c !!!...

and while you are closing to c
THE ENERGY NEEDED TO AADD VELOCITY
BECOMES INFINIT
you keep running after the accelerated body
investing more and more 'acceleration resources - (energy
while energy is as well mass in motion with c

and while your maximum running ability is
say 15 kph and the car you pusing is running
at 15 kmh
nothint will do
you will pump you energy and exaust youself
to death - running after the car but you will bever be able
to add a single additionl kmh to the car!!

you see the problem of out 'modern physicists
they dont think physics
they think only mathematics

so thje formula shoul not be

E=3Dgamma m times c^2

but ....

E/Gamma =3D mc^2 !!

AND m REMAINS COOOOOOOONSTANT !! (:-)
no need to invent new physical enetities (relativistic mass)
just for 'explaining' fucken ubnderstanding of physics

and please dont forget who explained it to you
the first time

ATB
Y.Porat
---------------------------