sci.physics.particle

On Mar 31, 8:33=A0am, festusby...@btinternet.com wrote:
> On 31 Mar, 06:12, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 8:44=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 31, 1:39=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
> > > > On Mar 30, 7:42=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > Following the current discussion about starting the LHC
>
> > > > > a few questions should (IMHO) be examined:
>
> > > > > 1
> > > > > is there a minimal critical mass of a black hole
> > > > > in order that it will survive continuously ??
>
> > > > > 2
> > > > > considering the H bomb explotion =A0 and knowledge-
> > > > > and experience --
> > > > > are 'black holes of some magnitude
> > > > > created there ??
>
> > > > Questions like this automatically exclude you from the non-debate.
>
> > > > > TIA
> > > > > Y.Porat
> > > > > --------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > ------------------
> > > please by pass the
> > > -little psychopath
>
> > > Y.P
> > > ------------------
>
> > Says the guy who seriously asked if H bombs make black holes.- Hide quot=
ed text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Well!!!, considering black holes are found only in the heart of a
> galaxy. Well will need at least 500 million fusion stars like our sun.
> But we cannot even produce on working stable fusion reactor yet.
> Ahahahaha!
>
> Soooooo! anyhooo! We do have a long way to go before we can generate
> the amount of energy a black hole requires.
>
> We should really be worried about our carbon foot print and the polar
> ice melting.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

----------------
you are right about global worming
now abouth the LHC

there must beno doubt abot it
so it is worth to think before opperating it
while we say black hole from LHC
we do not mean of couirse a big one
my question is
is there a chance for even a microscopic back hle to be created ??

it is imporant both theoretically and practically
if it will be a tiny balck hole (BH) that will disapear
imediately than it is not relvant practically
but may be theoretically

and let me tell you my oppinion and understanding :
BH is actually a bundle of protons that lost their electrons
and collaps to a closer distance between them
so mind you
it happence and abundant much more than you immagine
each fusion is a tiny black hole event !!

only that not big enough and lacking* the complete** set of
properties **to satrt to be the famous monster

so we have to be careful while doing something
that is unprecedented big !!

TIA
Y.Porat
---------------------