sci.physics.particle

On Apr 6, 12:24=A0am, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:

>
> You didn't comment on my main point in this post which was it should
> be possible to directly detect the positron/electron aether by doing
> experiments like this. Maybe the evidence of the J/Psi isn't that
> strong, but could you think of experiments that would make a much
> stronger prediction and confirmation of a positron/electron sea? If
> this could be proven, it would surely be a Nobel prize to the
> discoverer of this massive amount of hidden matter which could easily
> account for mysteries such as dark matter. I would think the promise
> of such a discovery would have lots of people investigating this idea
> seriously. This idea of a positron/electron sea isn't mine -
> mainstream science speaks of all sorts of seas - most recently that of
> the Higgs particle - which could simply end up being the positron/
> electron particle that I speak of. This would be a particle hiding in
> clear sight.

I'll address this paragraph especially. The reason I haven't commented
on your theories of electron-positron seas is that you are trying to
dig a gold mine after having scratched around on the surface with a
trowel. Digging 3 inches deep in light soil and then saying, "Hey,
this looks like it could be a good place to find gold! Whaddya think?"
is going to result in some raised eyebrows and some giggles, but most
people just walking on by. Now, if you ask someone who knows something
about mining for gold, the first thing he's going to tell you is that
you aren't going to successfully prospect for gold by digging 3 inches
deep with a trowel and then imagining there's gold underneath. He's
going to recommend that you learn quite a bit more about mining.

Reading a coffee-table book by Riordan isn't going to do it.
If you'd like a start, here's what you'll need to read:
Elementary Particle Physics, Cheng and O'Neill
An Introduction to Quarks and Partons, Close
Fundamental Forces of Nature, Huang
Quarks and Leptons, Halzen and Martin

PD