sci.physics.electromag

"Androcles" wrote in message
news:RczEj.309837$3m6.27806@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> "hanson" wrote in message
> news:W%vEj.6009$sw3.622@trnddc06...
> | no nad-"nade" aka Varney wrote in message
> news:64bff222-9d13-4893-a277-0de1d740e8ac@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> | "Androcles" wrote:
> | > "hanson" wrote in message
> | > news:1kbEj.16619$Id3.2721@trnddc07...
> | > | ..... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... AHAHAHAHA....
> | > | "Androcles" wrote in message
> | > |news:sc7Ej.34320$M9.5545@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> | > | great stuff,... profound and incisive, as usual, but beyond the
> | > | comprehension of any of parroting Einstein Dingleberries
> | > | who tried to make their case for Einstein's crock... ahahahaha...
> | > | >
> | > | Hey Andro, you sure do know how to flush out those virulent
> | > | Einstein Dingleberries... like fade "nade" > | > | Dunce PD-Draper, Hairy "harry" , Karandarse
> | > | Dunno Dono, Toilet Dweller Wabnig, Saucepan Szczepan Bia³ek"
> | > | , Variouos Kike Varneys and a host of others...
> | > | But sadly, all your heroic efforts only make those poor bastards
> | > | move closer to the warmth of Einstein's sphincter..... ahahaha...
> | > | Actually, do have some pity for them. Those brainwashed poor
> | > | dumbfucks, all being damaged goods now, do not realize that
> | > | they have fallen victim to the greatest intellectual con of the 20th
> | > | century.... DESPITE the fact that Einstein HIMSELF told them so
> | > | with/in his many admonishments, ever since 1920....:
> |
>
> | >
> | Androcles wrote:
> | > Me? Have pity? You misunderstand me, sir, pity would be an emotion.
> | > I reserve emotion for those that matter, not for dingbats.
> | > In matters of science I appear as this, blindfold:
> | > http://www.spectator.co.nz/images/justice.gif
> | > Why should anyone be interested in a clown that says:
> | > "After analyzing it. Well. This is what I can comment. Imagine
> | > yourself being in the moving orange horizontal,
> | > you can see the light moving at c.
> | > While for those at another frame of reference (in out seats
> | > looking at the monitor for instance), it may seem longer."
> | > "In out seats"? "it (c) may seem longer"?
> | >
> | No nad-nade explains:
> | What I simply meant is that ... Relativity will fail in a pure physical
> | world.. but it so happens we don't actually live in one.
> | nade
>
Andro wrote
> de Nada hallucinates the kind of world we live in.
>
hanson wrote:
of course, that is a classic symptom of Einstein Dingleberryism.
>
> | Andro continues:
> | > And that is after anal-yzing it well.
> | > I can't have pity for a lunatic, it wouldn't do any good anyway.
> | >
> | hanson continued:
> | > | they have fallen victim to the greatest intellectual con of the 20th
> | > | century.... DESPITE the fact that Einstein HIMSELF told them so
> | > | with/in his many admonishments, ever since 1920....:
> | > | ::AE:: .... "NOT to search at the same, now well lit places,
> | > | ::AE:: .... where he, Einstein, had been working".
> | > | >
> | > | --- More here about Einstein's Anus Mirabilis
> | > | (= Albert's sphincter where his EDs do worship):
> | > |
> | > | The nature and character traits of EDs:
> | > |
> | > | >
> | > | Einstein's conscience finally caught up with him, when he was
> | > | fessing up about the con of REL, ... one year before he folded
> | > | his tent, closed his umbrella, kicked the bucket, bit the grass
> | > | and puffed, ... when/where he said to Besso in 1954:
> | > | ::AE:: "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
> | > | ::AE:: on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In
> | > | ::AE:: that case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air,
> | > | ::AE:: gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of
> | > | ::AE:: modern physics." . [ & elsewhere]
> | > | ::AE::"why would anyone be interested in getting
> | > | ::AE:: exact solutions of such an ephemeral set of equations?"
> | > | >
> | > | Other Luminaries have followed suit agreeing with Albert's
> | > | final realizations, insights and assessments, saying:
> | > | >
> | > | ::: Professor Carver A. Mead of Caltech (a student of Feynman),
> | > | ::: who said
> | > | ::: "It is my firm belief that the last seven decades of the 20th
> | > | ::: century will be characterized in history
> | > | ::: as the dark ages of physics."
> | > | >
> | > | ::: or F.A Hayek, Nobel laureate, who said: "In the future,
> | > | ::: Humanity will see in our Epoch an Era of superstition,
> > | ::: essentially associated with the names of
> > | ::: Marx, Freud and Einstein"
> | > | :::
> | > | ::: or John Beckman, an astronomy professor and Einstein disciple:
> | > | ::: "The theory of relativity lives on. Is it a true picture of
> | > | ::: reality? That is probably more a matter of faith than of proof."
> | > | >
> | > | So, like in any movement and/or religion there are fanatic disciples
> | > | of which you have garnered a set here:.. the financially and
> | > | mentally poverty stricken Einstein Dingleberries..
> | > | . for whose, "here-and-now earthly Seelen-heil" it should
> | > | be pointed out that in the real world, today,
> | > | == mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit"
> | > | == *.edu and grantology ..................."does need REL - No shit"
> | > | == Promo, Sales & Movies..............."loves REL by the shitload"
> | > | == Jews protect it as cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or
> | > | == not".
> | > | But thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahaha... ahahanson
> | >
> | hanson wrote:
> | no-Nad-Varney listen... here's a copy/retort from/for your other post.
> | It's well meant, with concerns for your well being and benefit:
> | >
> | no-nad-"nade" promenaded in [1] & [2]
> news:796c4108-d9ff-4f80-b16d-e9acdd9b6951@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> news:64bff222-9d13-4893-a277-0de1d740e8ac@s19g2000prg.googlegroups.com.....
> | his Einstein Dingleberry intellect, yearning in his abject worship:
> | [1]
> | > If we can have holy week to commemorate the life of an
> | > non-existent man (Jesus doesn't truly exist historically, does he??)
> | > Why can't we have Einstein Week
> | > Einstein Week to be celebrated once a year around the world
> | > Who has the power to grant Einstein Week and make it part
> | > of holidays in the world? Can Bush do it?
> | [2]
> | > Relativity will fail in a pure physical world..
> | > but it so happens we don't actually live in one.
> | > no-nad-nade Varney
> | >
> | hanson wrote:
> | ahahahaha.. Varney, you've have lost your nads, and your chance,
> | to get your Einstein week, because of the comments you made
> | in [1] which makes all the bible-beating Jesus disciples mad at
> | you... and then [2] you killed all prospects for your EW with your
> | own conviction of you not living in a real world...
> | You are a loser, Varney!... Bad Scene, Varney!... ahahahaha....
> | >
> | But listen, you still can advocate an annual ED parade, like the
> | fabled doo-daa parades... Go for it. Partake and strut in there...
> | They're filled with all sorts of intellectual & emotional perverts,
> | Dingleberries, like yourself... You'll really feel to be very close
> | to even more than just Albert's sphincter in your ED "promenade"
> | Now get some nads again and include yourself by "promenading"
> | yourself in that parade as the chief of all Einstein Dingleberries...
> | You have made a good start in this NG. You have the right stuff.
> | >
> | Thanks for the laughs , Varney... ahaha... ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
Andro wrote:
> hanson, Are you sure it isn't de nada's prominent pomade?
>
hanson wrote:
... ahahaha... AHAHAHA... well, if that turns out to be so-n'such
then his pomade will serve poster no-gonad-"nade"-Varney at
least well enough to grease-up his own Dingleberries with it and
protect his own sphincter instead of only Einstein's... ahahaha...
But ED's have strange priorities though... ahahaha... ahahanson