sci.physics.particle

On Feb 13, 12:36 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Feb 12, 11:25 am, Eric Gisse wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 11, 11:20 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 12, 12:50 am, Zilla wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 12, 1:19 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > > and it i squite clear to me that even the largest LHC
> > > > > will not make it clearer
> > > > > if there will be no some change in basic paradigms
> > > > > like
> > > > > 'no mass in physics '
>
> > > > > because old catto saied :
> > > > > 'No mass --no real physics '
>
> > > > > ATB
> > > > > Y.Porat
> > > > > ------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > >http://www.itep.ru/ws/2003/procs/Froggatt.pdf
>
> > > > see the chapter "Fermion masses and mass protection".
>
> > > > Also in here
>
> > > >http://courses.washington.edu/phys55x/Physics%20558_lec2.htm
>
> > > > specifically:
>
> > > > "As we discussed last quarter, both vector particles and
>
> > > > terms in the Lagrangian for a gauge theory,
> > > > except for fermion mass terms, can be written
> > > > separately for the different chiral components".
>
> > > > Z.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > ---------------
> > > my poor advaice to you is to learn the most basic
> > > physics
> > > **before you are fiddling with matheamtics**
>
> > > the only good tip i can suggest to you
> > > for basic physics is
>
> > > no mass no real physics !!
> > > just as simple as that !!!
>
> > Translated: "I don't understand how massless particles can possibly
> > exist, so they are wrong."
>
> > -------------------------------
>
> and you
> a 24 years old mathematics parrot
> want to teach me the basics of physics ??? (:-)

No. I know a fool's errand when I see one.

>
> if there is no mass to a physical entity
> you cant detect it
> you dcant meaure it
> got it imbecil ??

What's the mass of a magnetic field?

Electric field?

Gravitational field?

Photon?

They don't have mass. You can detect them.

>
> there is no momentum without mass as well

Electromagnetic waves don't have mass in classical E&M, yet they still
transfer momentum. Why?

Have you ever even seen the analysis? Wait, you don't know what the
Poynting vector is so I guess that's a "no".

>
> got it disturbed parrot idiot mathematician ??

I'm not a mathematician, shit for brains.

> so go on waist your poor crooked life
> from now on on nonsense physics !!

Doesn't it just piss you off that I can so easily understand something
which you still haven't gotten after decades of work?

>
> keep well
> Y.Porat
> -------------------------------------
>
> ------------