sci.physics.particle

On Feb 12, 11:25=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Feb 11, 11:20 pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 12:50 am, Zilla wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 12, 1:19 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > and it i squite clear to me that even the largest LHC
> > > > will not make it clearer
> > > > if there will be no some change in basic paradigms
> > > > like
> > > > 'no mass in physics '
>
> > > > because old catto saied :
> > > > 'No mass --no real physics '
>
> > > > ATB
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > ------------------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > >
> > >http://www.itep.ru/ws/2003/procs/Froggatt.pdf
>
> > > see the chapter "Fermion masses and mass protection".
>
> > > Also in here
>
> > >http://courses.washington.edu/phys55x/Physics%20558_lec2.htm
>
> > > specifically:
>
> > > "As we discussed last quarter, both vector particles and
>
> > > terms in the Lagrangian for a gauge theory,
> > > except for fermion mass terms, can be written
> > > separately for the different chiral components".
>
> > > Z.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > ---------------
> > my poor advaice to you is to learn the most basic
> > physics
> > **before you are fiddling with matheamtics**
>
> > the only good tip i can suggest to you
> > for basic physics is
>
> > no mass no real physics !!
> > just as simple as that !!!
>
> Translated: "I don't understand how massless particles can possibly
> exist, so they are wrong."
>
> -------------------------------


and you
a 24 years old mathematics parrot
want to teach me the basics of physics ??? (:-)

if there is no mass to a physical entity
you cant detect it
you dcant meaure it
got it imbecil ??

there is no momentum without mass as well

got it disturbed parrot idiot mathematician ??
so go on waist your poor crooked life
from now on on nonsense physics !!

keep well
Y.Porat
-------------------------------------


------------