sci.physics.particle

"Eric Gisse" wrote in message
news:7d93a935-9ddc-4af5-9f75-3d13bd11db04@d21g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
: On Feb 27, 12:21 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
: > On Feb 26, 3:23 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
: >
: >
: >
: > > James Colvier wrote:
: > > > On Feb 25, 4:38 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
: > > >> James Colvier wrote:
: >
: > > >>> I was wondering if anybody knew anything about the possibility of
: > > >>> traveling faster than the speed of light.
: > > >> Superluminal transportation of information violates causality. The
: > > >> universe does not tolerate contradiction. If no information is
: > > >> involved transport can be instantaneous over any distance - Bell's
: > > >> inequality.
: >
: > > > The way I read that, it seems contradictory. It seems to say that
: > > > going faster than the speed of light violates causality, and goes on
: > > > to say that therefore, it can't be done. Then it says "If no
: > > > information is involved" (I don't entirely understand that...) then
: > > > anything can essentially "teleport".
: >
: > > >> The informed traveler uses a stardrive that goes back in time as it
: > > >> goes forward in space. One can then get from anywhere to anywhere
in
: > > >> a twinkling at 15 mph. Even Newport Beach, CA won't give you a
: > > >> traffic citation for that. (16 mph and you are constabulary
: > > >> "expectation of productivity" toast.)
: >
: > > > This I really do not understand. First off, what do you mean when
you
: > > > refer to "the informed traveler"? This seems hypothetical, so what
is
: > > > that doing there? And if it was going back in time, it wouldn't be
15
: > > > mph, it would be a negative speed (theoretically) correct?
: >
: > > >>> I studied E=mc2, but if I
: > > >>> understand it correctly, that doesn't actually state that it isn't
: > > >>> possible. If it were possible, what would it require, and how
would it
: > > >>> operate?
: > > >> Doing it isn't the problem. Going superluminal is the problem -
the
: > > >> mathematical singularity of division by zero at lightspeed for a
: > > >> massed particle. The Third Law of Thermodynamics is enforced by
the
: > > >> same singularity, but negative temperatures kelvin are trivially
: > > >> accessed by population inversions: NMR, medical MRI, EPR, masers,
: > > >> lasers, adiabatic demagnetization of paramagnetic salts in
cryogenic
: > > >> refrigeration.
: >
: > > > I don't doubt the amount of true facts in this post, but I am having
: > > > trouble deciphering it. Could you some of the lesser minds like me
: > > > understand what exactly the barrier is?
: >
: > > >> One goes the long way around, from +(infinity) to -(infinity) and
back
: > > >> up the other side thereby avoiding the singularity. The alert
reader
: > > >> is invited to erect a like paradigm and reduce to reduce to
practice
: > > >> for propagation of a massed particle.
: >
: > > > -James Colvier
: >
: > > Nature is observed to have a cosmic speed limit... only
: > > zero mass particle travel at the speed of light... Mass
: > > particle are always observed to travel < c .
: >
: > > Why? Good question!- Hide quoted text -
: >
: > > - Show quoted text -
: >
: > -----------------
: > he zero mass is in your skull
: >
: > the poton is the only mass that can tarvel at c
: > it is an exception case to the rule that
: > no mass can travel at c
: > 2
: > if the photon movement is in a helix movement
: > while the hellix can have any radius
: > (now listen carefully and think dont be a parrot)
: >
: > so
: > in that case
: > THE MOVEMENT **IN **THAT HELLIX CAN BE
: > GREATED THAN c !!
: >
: > (the movement of any step of the hellix is at c
: > along its axis
: > but the circumference movement in the hellix
: > is bigger than the movement along its axis !
: > anfd if the radius of that hellix is enormously big
: > than the tangent movenet along the circumference
: > (the path of the hellix) is bigger than c !!!!!
: > i would guess even qualitatively:
: > it will be :
: >
: > 2 pai *c !!!
: >
: > copyright insight
: >
: > 27.2.2008
: > Y.Porat
: > ------------------------------
:
: ...and your evidence for this is what, exactly?


His own ego, or to put it in his own words, "Ego has of his own is this.
You no understand? Because stupid be the one with the last glass eye and
whales don't move banisters."

So it must be everybody else's fault.