sci.physics.particle

On Feb 27, 12:21 am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Feb 26, 3:23 am, Sam Wormley wrote:
>
>
>
> > James Colvier wrote:
> > > On Feb 25, 4:38 pm, Uncle Al wrote:
> > >> James Colvier wrote:
>
> > >>> I was wondering if anybody knew anything about the possibility of
> > >>> traveling faster than the speed of light.
> > >> Superluminal transportation of information violates causality. The
> > >> universe does not tolerate contradiction. If no information is
> > >> involved transport can be instantaneous over any distance - Bell's
> > >> inequality.
>
> > > The way I read that, it seems contradictory. It seems to say that
> > > going faster than the speed of light violates causality, and goes on
> > > to say that therefore, it can't be done. Then it says "If no
> > > information is involved" (I don't entirely understand that...) then
> > > anything can essentially "teleport".
>
> > >> The informed traveler uses a stardrive that goes back in time as it
> > >> goes forward in space. One can then get from anywhere to anywhere in
> > >> a twinkling at 15 mph. Even Newport Beach, CA won't give you a
> > >> traffic citation for that. (16 mph and you are constabulary
> > >> "expectation of productivity" toast.)
>
> > > This I really do not understand. First off, what do you mean when you
> > > refer to "the informed traveler"? This seems hypothetical, so what is
> > > that doing there? And if it was going back in time, it wouldn't be 15
> > > mph, it would be a negative speed (theoretically) correct?
>
> > >>> I studied E=mc2, but if I
> > >>> understand it correctly, that doesn't actually state that it isn't
> > >>> possible. If it were possible, what would it require, and how would it
> > >>> operate?
> > >> Doing it isn't the problem. Going superluminal is the problem - the
> > >> mathematical singularity of division by zero at lightspeed for a
> > >> massed particle. The Third Law of Thermodynamics is enforced by the
> > >> same singularity, but negative temperatures kelvin are trivially
> > >> accessed by population inversions: NMR, medical MRI, EPR, masers,
> > >> lasers, adiabatic demagnetization of paramagnetic salts in cryogenic
> > >> refrigeration.
>
> > > I don't doubt the amount of true facts in this post, but I am having
> > > trouble deciphering it. Could you some of the lesser minds like me
> > > understand what exactly the barrier is?
>
> > >> One goes the long way around, from +(infinity) to -(infinity) and back
> > >> up the other side thereby avoiding the singularity. The alert reader
> > >> is invited to erect a like paradigm and reduce to reduce to practice
> > >> for propagation of a massed particle.
>
> > > -James Colvier
>
> > Nature is observed to have a cosmic speed limit... only
> > zero mass particle travel at the speed of light... Mass
> > particle are always observed to travel < c .
>
> > Why? Good question!- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> -----------------
> he zero mass is in your skull
>
> the poton is the only mass that can tarvel at c
> it is an exception case to the rule that
> no mass can travel at c
> 2
> if the photon movement is in a helix movement
> while the hellix can have any radius
> (now listen carefully and think dont be a parrot)
>
> so
> in that case
> THE MOVEMENT **IN **THAT HELLIX CAN BE
> GREATED THAN c !!
>
> (the movement of any step of the hellix is at c
> along its axis
> but the circumference movement in the hellix
> is bigger than the movement along its axis !
> anfd if the radius of that hellix is enormously big
> than the tangent movenet along the circumference
> (the path of the hellix) is bigger than c !!!!!
> i would guess even qualitatively:
> it will be :
>
> 2 pai *c !!!
>
> copyright insight
>
> 27.2.2008
> Y.Porat
> ------------------------------

...and your evidence for this is what, exactly?