Group: sci.physics.particle
From: "Autymn D. C."
Date: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: Solution to the missing antimatter in the universe

Trim the quotes, ye worthles bastards-pigs.

On Mar 29, 11:22=A0pm, frankli...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > > The Pion basically decays into an electron and 3 neutrinos.
>
> I'm surprised that you didn't comment on my explanation of beta decay
> which eliminates the need for the W particle and the weak force
> entirely. I believe the best way to unify the forces it to remove as
> many fictitious forces as possible. Both the strong and weak forces
> are unncessary in my model. This leaves only the magnetic,
> electrostatic and gravity forces. Magnetic forces are electrostatic in
> nature (not just related, but a direct consequence and made out of an
> alignment of electrostatic fields in the aether) and I am still trying
> to fit gravity under the electrostatic force.

I already took out the weak fortia. As you still count "magnetic" and
"electrostatic", you are as blindly baffelt as the academics who
couldn't see or count wham the true forti=E6 are: http://google.com/groups?q=
=3DAutymn+New-Model.
I foretold everything there could ever be. The so called weak forse
is the electrocoloral (or el=E8ctroquoloral) and coloruelectric (or
quoloruel=E8ctric) diforse.

> I say this because my model would pretty much have to say an electron,
> is an electron, is an electron. A pion and muon would have to be some
> modified energy state of the electron - something like how the same
> set of atoms can combine to form different chemical compounds.

If you look at my formula for the composite neutrino, you could work
out backwards from decay formul=E6 thas a mu=F2n is merely a excited pi=F2n,=

or a pi=F2n-positronium quasinobil atom.

http://google.com/groups?q=3Dsupergenium

> only speculate why. Although I would imagine that whatever you came up
> in the standard model could possibly apply just as well since the
> fractional charges play no part in the final result and might as well
> be calculated with integral charge values as my model would require.

If you want integral charges, multiply them by 3.

> answered. It would be much different if you pointed out a particle
> that would clearly violate fermion conservation if only integral
> charges and positrons/electrons were the only constituents.

El=E8ctr=F2ns are el=E8ctric, which come in 2. Quarks are coloral. which
come in 3. (Quarks are also el=E8ctric, which make 3 6.) These
properties are independent. You can't make a pi=F2n out of el=E8ctr=F2ns as=

it has onely two bodies.

-Aut

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass