sci.physics.electromag

On 20 mar, 16:25, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
>
>
> >> It seems to me that engineering people do not use
> >> some theories. Example: All EM equations are for the
> >> incompressible fluid (hydraulc analogy).
> >
> >Fine analogy. This is also a conclusion regarding real em
> >energy being described as localized photons.
>
> Are your photons compressible? They should not.

The model reveals that the energy that they are made of is
incompressible.

The volume that is part of the equation is the volume that the
energy of the photon would occupy if it was statically compressed
into the smallest sphere possible. The energy contained in this
volume has to be incompressible and isotropic for the equation
to remain true, as hinted at in the paper, and as fully explained in
the complete model.

Of course it is in oscillating motion, so this volume can not
remain spherical as the oscillation proceeds. But whatever
stretching and compressing it must sustain as it oscillates
electromagnetically, it remains has to remain constant as
long as the wavelength remains constant.

That's what the model reveals.

> Electrons must be. Hydraulic analogy is useless (except teaching).
> S*

In context, it is not useless, but in this model, it is a reflexion
of physical reality as far as the substance that "energy" is made
of, whatever it may be.

Andr=E9 Michaud