sci.physics.particle

--
This message is brought to you by Androcles
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

"Paul Mays" wrote in message
news:R8rMj.1293$HG1.138@fe107.usenetserver.com...
| Let me try ( I have a really hard time getting the concept in the head to
be
| understandable on the page) to explain why our seeming direct observation
of
| the universe is skewed be the intrinsic bias of us , and every tool we
use,
| being made of the matter that was converted out of the QP of the BB.
|
| First I start from the position that there WAS a BB , this is a position
| solely based on my agreement with COBE and other observation platforms
that
| seem to show expansion
| from a starting point

Where and when is it then, this mythical starting point?
Paul Mays logic; this pencil is broken, we can see it is:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/geoopt/optpic/brokpen.jpg