sci.physics.electromag

"Don Kelly" wrote in message
news:3DgGj.122040$pM4.117468@pd7urf1no...
> ----------------------------
> "terrylhewettsr" wrote in message
> news:fs76p8$p8f$1@news.netins.net...
>>
>> "Don Kelly" wrote in message
>> news:YnkFj.108368$w94.105201@pd7urf2no...
>>> ----------------------------
>>> "terrylhewettsr" wrote in message
>>> news:fs24gj$b7i$1@news.netins.net...
>>>>>> chamber/spool for winding coils around the armature,
>>>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spooldblslicesm.jpg
>>>>> ---------------------
>
>>
>> I agree that my writings and methods of expressions are fragmented and of
>> very little scientific terminology.
>>
>> That's what you get with inventors. Educated outside the norms of
>> academia and eccentric.
>>
>> Don =1 is unity, made to stand in calculation. A multiplicative identity.
>> as you put it "a much nicer number" calculation which is the basis of
>> scientific explanation (not so absolute). A unified state with entropy.
>>
>> =0 or rather 0.99999999... unworkable in mathematics. A additive
>> identity. a not so kind number. Natures (absolute) explanation. A unified
>> state barring entropy.
>>
>> It's not a matter of backwards but parallel. Both understandings are
>> correct. However man's scientific explanation is plauged by entropy.
>> Simply because we don't believe a closed system is possible.
>>
>> Nature stands quiet and really offers no explanation. It is up to us to
>> find it's secrets. IMHO Scouring through centuries of complicated
>> scientific explanation isn't working. Only through discovery will we
>> communicate with natural physics.
>>
>> Typical toroidal transformers are not designed to have the core spin.
>> That's one of the many innovations mechanics has contributed to this
>> mechanism. Your right i do need to include a wiring schematic showing the
>> connections. None are shorted. the drive coils are superconductive. I
>> have designed it so that multiple field pairs are interracted upon
>> simultaneously. this eliminates the need for mechanically switching the
>> coils to drive the armature.
>>
>> a single pair within the drive coils field would flip to align attracting
>> fields as Coulomb predicts. a multiple field set of a non conductive rod
>> will act differently as the fields are bound to the rods mass and unable
>> to flip to align with attracting fields locally so the whole rod wil try
>> to flip within drive coil.
>>
>> However the rod and ring are two different forms and have different
>> characteristics. the ring will be unable to flip within the drive coils
>> as the mass of the ring is caged at several points around it. It has no
>> option but to move in a annular motion as designed. entropy has been
>> reduced to eccentric motion. there is no uncertainty all vectors are
>> occupied with mass be it charged field pairs or void of a physical field.
>> velocities and inertial frames can be predicted even at a hyper extreme
>> rate of change.
>>
>> The purpose for the non conductive core is to eliminate any chance of
>> eddies bieng generated withing the core as the fields are reduced to
>> their permanent state within the drive coils. the conductive or iron core
>> would cause undesired inverse properties and attract the whole core to
>> the drive coils and would not suspend the core it would simply be drawn
>> to the coils.
>>
>> Most of physics is relatve to this mechanism. It is a mechanically simple
>> mechanism, however i cannot find anything more complex to explain.
>
> Sorry, still more nonsense.
>
> Still no explanation as to why there should be a spin. Don't assume that
> the magnetic forces are in a direction to do this -apparently you didn't
> look up Coulombs force law or didn't understand it Try the "right hand
> rule" as a simplified substitute- (they may try to expand the diameter of
> the coil but not produce force in the direction of the flux) nor will they
> try to flip the rotor (no -gyroscopic forces aren't the answer).
>
> However what you have written, allowing for the fragmentation, do show
> that you really, outside normal bounds of education, have ignored what has
> been found from repeated experimentation and are supplying a gloss of
> words from math and physics, without an understanding of what they mean.
> In addition, there are some statements that appear to defy common sense.
>
> I would suggest that you start with some basic references and first learn
> what is there so that you have a better understanding. There is no problem
> in thinking outside the box or being educated outside the normal bounds of
> academia but there is a problem when ignorance is used as a substitute
> for what is actually known (yes, physics is based on actual experimental
> evidence).
>
> There is no use continuing this thread.
> --
>
> Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
> remove the X to answer
>
>>
>>
>
>
Don,
Coulombs force laws are written all over this mechanism, constant as well.
This is simple technology and in some ways is like what is used in mag-lev
trains. I termed the toroid armature as such because it is essentially a
stator. the permanent fields will prevail in the semi hostile environment of
the electromagnetic drive coils. the fields of the toroid armature are
spaced between attracting north and south poles of the permanent fields.
this spacing is to focus the flux where the attracting fields meet. This
flux line is what i term as pseudo in the sense that allthough it is real
and in a state of constant attraction to next opposite field of the
armature. the attracting flux field is pseudo in the sense that it has
strong and weak forces and is easly manipulated. by the more aggressive
electromagnetic field within the drive coils. the drive coil as all coils
have a flux field in the center along the length of the coil. this flux line
will seek alignment with the flux fields of the toroid armature that are
caged within the electromagnetic drive coil. The timing of any motor is
important and is acheived by slightly offsetting the drive coils from
themselfs and the toroid armature. This timing stages the armature so that
only one flux field will align with one of the drive coils flux field. the
other 3 drive coils are staged to be repulsing the nearest permanent flux
field of the armature segment. The drive coils are polar one end is going to
be N and the other S. the permanent fields of the armature will also attract
and repulse the coils poles. Via coil length we can align this interraction
as well. The armatures fields are on a radius the inner radius fields are
closer than the outer radius fields in reference to the next field. the
drive coils are also wound around the radius. the field strength will be
increased on the inner radius of the drive coils as the windings are more
compacted. the same follows through when considering the field strength of
the pseudo flux field in the space between the permanent fields of the
toroid armature. The inner radius will be attracting more than the outer
field. Direction is a matter of right hand rule and I propose a left hand
rule would be appropriate for reverse direction. Gyroscopic forces is a
byproduct of spinning mass not an answer to any certain problem withing this
mechanism. I have ignored nothing the repeated experimentation is noted,
however no experimentation outside of mine has encoumpassed a toroid
armature.
the gramme ring would be the closest however there are very few simularities
between the mechanisms.

I agree i don't have a firm grasp on the formulation involved in describing
this mechanism. I have did extensive research on what i portray in regards
to this mechanism and the understanding of mechanical interractions involved
in the mechanism. Sure they defy common sense The mechanism as a whole
defies common understanding.