sci.physics.electromag

"Don Kelly" wrote in message
news:YnkFj.108368$w94.105201@pd7urf2no...
> ----------------------------
> "terrylhewettsr" wrote in message
> news:fs24gj$b7i$1@news.netins.net...
>>
>> "Don Kelly" wrote in message
>> news:vh%Ej.105405$pM4.45395@pd7urf1no...
>>> ----------------------------
>>> "terrylhewettsr" wrote in message
>>> news:fs1g0p$uja$1@news.netins.net...
>>>> Invention is the marriage of mechanics and the sciences With
>>>> innovations in both fields.
>>>>
>>>> I am an inventor of highly innovative technology. The technology is
>>>> basic at best.
>>>> however the byproducts are many. Everything is relative through spin.
>>>> Fluid dynamics
>>>> implicates that every atom of it is spinning. Some extremely slow such
>>>> as a solid. the
>>>> specific gravity and kinetic energy are fully conserved. It's seemingly
>>>> at rest.
>>>>
>>>> Inventing is mostly problem solving. How great your invention? is
>>>> directly related to how
>>>> great the problem you set out to solve. Induction one of Faraday's
>>>> brain child's. The act
>>>> of putting a changing magnetic flux field through an induction coil.
>>>> The problem is how
>>>> to do that cyclic. The answer is a multipole toroid armature. Super
>>>> conductance via a
>>>> magnetic bearing in an ideal configuration. Caging the toroid armatures
>>>> permanent field
>>>> arrangement. Path of least resistance predicts the toroid armature will
>>>> spin. This is a
>>>> frictionless environment with the potential for high efficiency.
>>>>
>>>> The whole goal here was to drive a changing magnetic flux field through
>>>> an induction coil
>>>> cyclic. It turned out driving multiple changing magnetic flux fields
>>>> through several
>>>> induction coils cyclic. In essence it is free energy. However the
>>>> byproducts of spinning
>>>> a mass particularly a ring at hyper extreme rates has the potential to
>>>> include
>>>> antigravity as a byproduct. Unity is defined as the radius of a
>>>> natural sine. Given the
>>>> previous the form toroid is unity by form alone. to spin the form
>>>> toroid is simply over
>>>> unity. The transformations of energy in the SRTT are unified
>>>> transforming electric to
>>>> kinetic and back to electric cyclic for infinity.
>>>>
>>>> This mechanism is fully multifarious via design variations.
>>>>
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringdrawingincomplete.jpg
>>>>
>>>> There are two kinds of coils 4 each. drive coils and induction coils.
>>>> No pulsing
>>>> necessary it is centipedal drive system the drive coils magnetically
>>>> cage the permanent
>>>> fields of the toroid armature. Electromotive forces as defined by
>>>> faraday motivates the
>>>> toroid armature seeking the path of least resistance in an eccentric
>>>> manner orbital about
>>>> the axis. Induction coils inducing elec energy via driving multiple
>>>> magnetic flux fields
>>>> through 4 induction coils at potentially extreme rates of change. In
>>>> comparison it would
>>>> be like shaking a faraday flashlight 8,000,000 times a minute.
>>>>
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!ringofmagnetswithspacers.jpg
>>>>
>>>> The Armature once in motion is pure kinetic energy with all the
>>>> byproducts associated
>>>> with spinning mass.
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6r002.jpg Note the
>>>> physical magnets placements in comparison to the actual fields
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!centipedalfieldring.jpg OK
>>>> the spacing of the
>>>> attracting N and S poles has created a extra flux field. It is there in
>>>> a physical sense
>>>> yet it is pseudo in the sense that it's strong and weak forces can be
>>>> easily manipulated.
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/CentipedalDrive.jpg the
>>>> following image is how
>>>> the fields may look as the armature is caged by the drive coils.
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/fluxlines4.jpg please forgive
>>>> the crude
>>>> drawings as i don't have a source for computer modeled works. The
>>>> prototype is #6 and
>>>> will never be completed as a testable model. This mechanism is designed
>>>> as a one piece
>>>> toroid armature consisting of a ceramic or comparable material that can
>>>> be host to a
>>>> permanent field that is non conductive.
>>>>
>>>> These drawings are linear this one is the coils and spacing example,
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spoolcoilplacementsm.jpg
>>>> this one is a
>>>> double slice showing the ring chamber and the molded gear section for
>>>> twisting the
>>>> chamber/spool for winding coils around the armature,
>>>> http://terrylhewettsr.rackhost.net/images/!pt6spooldblslicesm.jpg
>>>>
>>>> Anyways if you could direct this transmittal document to those that may
>>>> have an interest
>>>> in it for peer review or potential research for any specific
>>>> implementation. this is
>>>> unique highly innovative technology. You and your associates are
>>>> presented with a unique
>>>> opportunity.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> terry
>>>>
>>> ---------------------
>>> The explanation is utter rubbish (e.g. what the hell is the radius of a
>>> natural sine) and the "presentation of a unique opportunity" is the
>>> kicker- both are saying beware the scam.
>>>
>>> But supposing, as you apparently are doing, superconductivity and no
>>> friction it appears to be a no loss system so that perpetual motion
>>> could occur without violating conservation of energy (and 100%
>>> efficiency).
>>> All well and good but, even if you could this 100% efficiency (and you
>>> can't) - then what?- all it could do is chase its own tail and be
>>> incapable of doing any useful work which would appear as losses.
>>>
>>> Plonk
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
>>> remove the X to answer
>>>
>>>
>> Don tell me about gyroscopic forces and kinetic energy and how things
>> that are in motion tend to stay in motion. Tell me about electromagnetic
>> induction. and tell me the effects of driving a changing magnetic flux
>> field through an induction coil.
>> Then understand that the toroid armature consists of multiple changing
>> flux fields going through 4 or by design variations multiple induction
>> coils cyclic for infinity.
>>
>> The operational environment is ideal for the transformation of energy at
>> a hyper extreem rate.
>>
>> Rubbish or not it's real. radius of a natural sine is a definition of
>> unity and the most accurate if i might add.
>> Peer review is the unique oppertunity.
>>
>> By your own confessions of just a brief review of the technology you
>> understand that i am utilizing superconductance in the mechanism. That is
>> un-precedented in the history of man as our knowledge and understanding
>> is somewhat limited in the technology.
>
> I see where you get the "radius of a natural sine" Unfortunately, you have
> it backwards- all that is meant is that the (natural) sine function is
> expressed in terms of a unit circle-simply because it is convenient to do
> so (vertical component/radius is neater for radius =1). It could as easily
> be defined in terms of a circle of radius "2.32" but that would be an
> inconvenient nuisance and 1 is a much nicer number. So the fact that the
> radius of a unit circle is 1 or unity simply means that it was defined
> that way (hence "unit" circle). So all you are saying is that 1=1(exactly)
> in a roundabout and rather obfuscating way- and saying:
>
> "Unity is defined as the radius of a natural sine. Given the previous the
> form toroid is unity by form alone."
>
> is completely meaningless.
>
> The rest of your statements are still gibberish. What you have is
> essentially a toroidal transformer with multiple windings- with
> unspecified connections (some shorted? and which may be superconductive
> (believe it or not such transformers have been made but don't exhibit any
> tendency to have a rotating core). There appears to be no basis for the
> contention that the core will rotate. "Path of least resistance " is not
> actually a scientific principle of use here (Coulomb's Law and some
> understanding of vectors affecting are more applicable but won't help
> you), particularly as you are implying a non-conductive core.
>
> Anyhow, you can consider this about as good a peer review as you will
> get -and probably the last - at least from me unless you can express
> yourself more clearly and use technically appropriate language. Yes, I
> do know about kinetic energy, inertia and gyroscopic forces (rusty on the
> gyro , I admit ) and am well versed in the effects of changing magnetic
> fields in a coil.
> --
>
> Don Kelly dhky@shawcross.ca
> remove the X to answer
>
>

I agree that my writings and methods of expressions are fragmented and of
very little scientific terminology.

That's what you get with inventors. Educated outside the norms of academia
and eccentric.

Don =1 is unity, made to stand in calculation. A multiplicative identity. as
you put it "a much nicer number" calculation which is the basis of
scientific explanation (not so absolute). A unified state with entropy.

=0 or rather 0.99999999... unworkable in mathematics. A additive identity. a
not so kind number. Natures (absolute) explanation. A unified state barring
entropy.

It's not a matter of backwards but parallel. Both understandings are
correct. However man's scientific explanation is plauged by entropy. Simply
because we don't believe a closed system is possible.

Nature stands quiet and really offers no explanation. It is up to us to find
it's secrets. IMHO Scouring through centuries of complicated scientific
explanation isn't working. Only through discovery will we communicate with
natural physics.

Typical toroidal transformers are not designed to have the core spin. That's
one of the many innovations mechanics has contributed to this mechanism.
Your right i do need to include a wiring schematic showing the connections.
None are shorted. the drive coils are superconductive. I have designed it so
that multiple field pairs are interracted upon simultaneously. this
eliminates the need for mechanically switching the coils to drive the
armature.

a single pair within the drive coils field would flip to align attracting
fields as Coulomb predicts. a multiple field set of a non conductive rod
will act differently as the fields are bound to the rods mass and unable to
flip to align with attracting fields locally so the whole rod wil try to
flip within drive coil.

However the rod and ring are two different forms and have different
characteristics. the ring will be unable to flip within the drive coils as
the mass of the ring is caged at several points around it. It has no option
but to move in a annular motion as designed. entropy has been reduced to
eccentric motion. there is no uncertainty all vectors are occupied with mass
be it charged field pairs or void of a physical field. velocities and
inertial frames can be predicted even at a hyper extreme rate of change.

The purpose for the non conductive core is to eliminate any chance of eddies
bieng generated withing the core as the fields are reduced to their
permanent state within the drive coils. the conductive or iron core would
cause undesired inverse properties and attract the whole core to the drive
coils and would not suspend the core it would simply be drawn to the coils.

Most of physics is relatve to this mechanism. It is a mechanically simple
mechanism, however i cannot find anything more complex to explain.