sci.physics.electromag

On Feb 17, 3:08 pm, Peter Bowditch wrote:
> Benj wrote:
> >On Feb 12, 2:40 pm, Peter Bowditch wrote:
>
> >> >> >So what do I know- really?
>
> >> >> Nothing, by the look of things.
>
> >> >So you repeat your ignorance a third time and then try to "win" the
> >> >debate with ad hominem name-calling!
>
> >> Why do quackery supporters almost universally fail to understand what
> >> "ad hominem" means?
>
> >Why do you insist upon demonstrating your ignorance in a public
> >forum? Don't you know how to actually READ the things you post?
>
> >*Ad Hominem* dear boy, is a latin phrase meaning "to the man" meaning
> >in a debate an attack upon the character of the opponent rather than
> >addressing his arguments.
>
> Why do quackery supporters almost universally fail to understand what
> "ad hominem" means?
>
> > Now I know you can do this: Read carefully
> >the above statement you posted. John said "what do I know?" and you
> >countered with "nothing by the look of things". Anyone with even a
> >modest command of the English language can easily see you said that
> >John "knows nothing"! It was an attack on John's intelligence. It was
> >NOT a response to his debating points. It is in short, an "ad
> >hominem" attack!
>
> "Ad hominem" is an attack based on an a priori assumption or
> statement. In this case John had exhibited his ignorance and then
> asked a question which I answered based on the evidence before us all.
>
>
>
> >Why do you insist over and over that I embarrass you and demonstrate
> >your ignorance in public? Did you ever think of taking an on-line
> >correspondence course to get your diploma?
>
> >It's better to keep silent and be suspected of being a fool than to
> >open your mouth and remove all doubt!
>
> >I'm sorry. This is just too easy. I'm outta here.
>
> That's the way. Run away.
>
> --
> Peter Bowditch aa #2243

Hey, all I can say is, I experimented with
these 'zappers', and immediately after starting to
'zap' these two MS patients, who I still work with,
they both went into remission and are actually still
*regaining* function.
The one fellow had absolutely
*no* movement in three out of four limbs and limited
movement in the right hand. Immediately he regained
most of the right hand and some in the other three.
Today, I notice his left hand is still loosening up and
regaining tone and flex.
Coinkydink?
Then there were the two HepCers that immediately
stopped testing positive.
Also coincidence?

HepC once is 5%, so give me
the odds of all four of these, all immediately following
getting 'zapped' .

Would it be............5% of 5%? Times
what for the MS remissions? Those are less or more than 5%
Wait, I'll Google it................well, they seem to say remissions
occur with MS also at 5%, but the disease is still
occurring underneath, and they're toast just as fast, so big deal,
but anyway, that's a 5% X 5% X 5% X 5% chance- hey,
I'm sure that's quite possible Peter, Peter, Pumpkin Eater.

John