sci.physics.electromag

wrote in message
news:69147cf7-5f92-40a9-9824-58a1ef01b64b@s8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On 31 Mrz., 09:20, Benj wrote:
>>
>> I especially like his "unitary" theory that comes out of "featureless
>> [cut --- ]
>
>> On Mar 30, 2:27 pm, "FrediFizzx" wrote:
>>
>> > Christoph Schiller is hardly a crackpot nor an idiot. The web page
>> > is
>> [cut --- ]
>
> I wrote:
>> I just discovered a new crackpot preprint
>> http://www.motionmountain.net/research/research.html
>
> Lubos Motl has clearly defined what makes a crackpot:
> somebody who likes discrete models, who believes
> in the generalized uncertainty principle, who believes that
> space-time is not continuous, and who dislikes string theory.
> The author qualifies on all points.
>
> When I reloaded his page to go through Motls list, I found
> out that Schiller even qualifies as an Einstein crackpot;
> he has added a second preprint, even more crazy than
> the first. He is a crackpot.

How nice of you to snip out "A Speculation".

Best,

Fred Diether
Co-moderator sci.physics.foundations