sci.physics.particle

On Apr 7, 6:48=A0pm, Kumar wrote:
> On Apr 7, 3:47=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 6, 4:29=A0pm, Kumar wrote:
>
> > > On Apr 6, 12:49=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > On Apr 5, 10:58=A0am, Kumar wrote:
> > > snip>
> > > > > > ---------------
>
> > > > > > 'No mass no real physics
>
> > > > > > ATB
> > > > > > Y.Porat
> > > > > > =A0-
>
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > > I have not considered & mentioned Gravitational force(GF) by a
> > > > > mystrious entity(except prime force if there). Instead of mass, I =
am
>
> > > > there i sno force without motion and mass
> > > > and collission of mass
> > > > ----------> just considering motion in and of a mass/body as a creat=
er/mediator of
> > > > > GF.
>
> > > > ok that is my oppinion as well !!
>
> > > When we say GF is dependant on mass & distance, can't be incomplete in=

> > > view GF can also be dependant on density(volume & mass)? As such,
> > > should volume of mass also be not relevant?
>
> > ------------
> > in short distances it is relevant
> > but not for =A0very distant masses
> > --------------
> > =A0If we consider motion is> related to GF, whether particles in denser =
sunstance
>
> > (substances ??)
>
> > =A0will not have
>
> > > lower freedom of motion?
>
> > we are not talking about motion* inside *
> > mass A and B
> > we are talking about 'gravitons' (or circlons)
> > that move outside =A0A and B =A0'
>
> How these are outside of both A and B?
-------------------
A and B are sending 'mesengers' -- outwards

Y.Porat
----------------------------------