sci.physics.particle

On Mar 29, 2:05=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
> On Mar 29, 6:10=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 28, 2:40=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:> On Mar 28,=
6:24=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
> > snip> > Intresting but bit more technical for me. Does it not suggest
> > that all> > fundamental forces are related to each other?- Hide quoted t=
ext -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > ----------------
> > > yes!
> > > i dont have a direct phone to God =A0(:-)
>
> > =A0Trying to get such idea/knowledge (of prime/one force) may not be
> > possible without it. :)
>
> > > all i cantell you is my private understandings and guesses
> > > yet i think i have some long period of folowing scinece
> > > and even my private investigations and findings
> > > after a long resarch project about the structure of matter
> > > that lasted many years
> > > so
> > > yess
> > > i guess that actually all forces arer based on the same simple 'trick'=

> > > that is why i suggest the 'Circlon' idea :
> > > a basic particle that
> > > *moved **naturally* in a curved path !!
> > > that idea should replace the 'curved space time' idea !!
> > > (excuse the arrogance ...)
> > > matter spreading nonstop a sort of a fountain
> > > of circlons
> > > they are epread out but come back because of the
> > > corved nature of theit movement
> > > and that is btw who attraction force doe snot get lost !!!
> > > if it was done by something that moves in straight lines
> > > it would ....... guess what??
> > > most of them should be lost in case they miss the target
> > > yet it does not happen =A0ass an experimantal fact
> > > now
> > > if two masses are close and each of themis spreading its
> > > fountain'
> > > there is a situation in which those circlons
> > > suround the other mass and hit it from its rare side @!
> > > may be some of them from the front side
> > > 9the shortest line between the two masses)
> > > but those at the front side ((cllide and canceleach other
> > > from the opposite side
> > > so we get
> > > **an unballanced force * that pushes thmmasses
> > > close to each other
> > > and stronger an stronger as comming closer
> > > because in that close distance
> > > those 'fountains are thicker !!
> > > how about that ??
> > > 2
> > > another surprising idea"
> > > if you folow my chain of orbital idea
> > > =A0THE CIRCLON' CAN EXPLAIN THAT CHAIN OF ORBITALS
> > > =A0ther very exostance and their beiavious
> > > a closed 'fountan ' that conraines a big amput of circlons
> > > canbahave like a sort of a solid ring !!!
> > > and there you got the chain of orbitals that are
> > > more massive at the base (mother orbital)
> > > and getting looser and less massive as they get
> > > firther away from that motrher orbital
> > > (the bundle of mass that moves ina closed circle
> > > i s =A0more massive at themother particle aria (volume )
> > > since allthe basic particles that make that structre
> > > always comes back in a circular movement
>
> > > another assumption abouth those corclons is that
> > > a circlon wil keep it sradius of movement
> > > untill and unless it colides with another one
> > > (parallel to Newtons forst law of motion
> > > but not in a straight line!)
> > > anothe imjportant note :
> > > a ring od circlons can move ijn a straight line
> > > ie
> > > if its center of gravity (of the ring) is moving in a stright line
> > > or simpler:
> > > thecenter of gravity of a ring orbital
> > > CAN =A0 \move in straigh tlines
> > > even though the movement** in the ring** is circular!! (:-)
> > > so =A0for a n =A0 observer from ousde it
> > > each circlon there is doing a composit =A0movement
> > > how about that ??
>
> > > TIA
> > > Y.Porat
> > > ---------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Thanks but still more technical.
>
> > Btw, can we consider GF just as an inward push
>
> yess
> i think that any attraction force is
> at the ebd of the day =A0a push force
> force can be done (att heend of the day
> though not always obvious -)**only by collision**
> and collision cannot make a pull force !!
> so it i sat the end of the day a collision force
> 'att eh right place and location
> or even a **resuly or balace of froces
> actually =A0unballanced force )
> that is how i use the Cirlon to explain any attractionforce !!
> --------
>
> =A0( tarnado or whirlpool
>
> sort of ...
> but not any whirlpool will do it
> it must be a special whirlpool
> a private case of a whirlpool
> but mattwer there is not roattion all of it only in one dorection
> there is there
> a front and back motion !!!!and **biased**
> not isometric motion =A0motion so it ceates
> an unballanced force !!
> --------
> ----------> type effect) due to earth's motions?-
>
> asi said
> just the symetric motion of earth cannot do it
> it is in my theory Circlons
> from earth and sun (mostly tthose from sun that do it )
> moving as i suggested- that do it
> btw
> if i am right
> ther should be a silght differnce in g
> between our lighted side
> and our 'dark side' fron sun
> while rather the lightted side shoud be somewaht weaker??
>
> can it be =A0 meaured ??
> ie
> you take a fixed spot
> andsee if there is a slight difference between
> g at night and day =A0????
> yet as you immagine
> even a slight difference in g multiplied by
> a very big aria is a big qauntity
>
> TIA
> Y.Porat
> ------------------
>
> =A0Hide quoted text -
>
>
>
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Instea, can GF be combined of two forces, one push force by its motion
and other by earths magnetic force along with inersteller forces
opreting on earth?