sci.physics.particle

On Mar 27, 10:19=A0am, Kumar wrote:
> On Mar 27, 12:31=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 27, 5:45=A0am, Kumar wrote:
>
> > > On Mar 26, 12:14=A0pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
> > > > > > Can we just related four forces mediating these nature's law/
> > > > > initiations. I think, gravity may be relevant to "nature balances
> > > > > itself". :)
> > > A
> > > > ---------------
> > > > 'see the 'chain of orbitals' ides
>
> > > > Y.Porat
> > > > -------------------------------- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > Pls tell me more about it.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > ----------------
> > anyone who saw my model
> > saw it graphycally and symbolically
> > anyway
> > i can try and describe it by afew words:
>
> > the thesis is that
> > orbitals as known now are sort of closed curves
> > now my innovative idea is that
> > those orbitals are not just separated single entities
> > but can as well combine to a
> > ;Chain of orbitals' !!
> > if you like some simlistic methaphore:
> > like the human =A0 invented chain of say links
> > waht is special in that chain ?? a few things
> > 1
> > since we agree that any orbital is something dymanic
> > somethings that move in that curved criture-
> > nothin can interfere in its path or else it will collide and
> > be distroyed mutually
> > so
> > if liks 'whants to combine'
> > they must live inpeace witheachother
> > ie not to interfere one with the path of the other
> > the simplest arangment that one can thing
> > ios that those links are connected one inside the other
> > *inj a diffrent plan**(similar to =A0the uman =A0invented chain is )
>
> > now comes another forwards step =A0revolutionary suggestion
> > that actually is inevitable by my findings about the
> > atom and nuc structre :
>
> > *it is not only that the orbitals *of the same order* can link
>
> > EVEN ORBITALS OF DIFFERENT ORDERS- CAN LINK !!
>
> > =A0so back to practice:
> > lets take an example
> > if the electyron is an orbital
> > and a nuclear particle is anorbital as well
> > they can link as i described above to
> > =A0A CHAIN OF ORBITALS !!
>
> > =A0sop waht is the innovation here??
>
> > the nuclear orbital is not controlling the electron orbital
> > by sort of a mysterious remote control but ...
> > by immediate thouch and connection =A0between them !!
> > and btw
> > it explaines nicely the facts known
> > that strong forces are becoming stronger while some
> > strech is done on the chain
> > but is the chain is overcome and breaks
> > the stron force imediately and suddenly disapear!!
> > (like the human chain
> > it has some freedom of movemen along some distance
> > but if you strech it very hard it beraks suddeny
> > iow
> > it explained the stron force as very strong but....
> > only a very short range !!
> > beyond that range it ' suddenly does not exist'
> > 2
> > i found in my reasurch
> > that there is not only a nuclear strong force connected to the
> > electron
> > but
> > there is some MEDIATING UKNOWN =A0ORBITAL
> > =A0that i called the medium orbitalt that makes it 3 links
> > 3
> > no that idea goes evenfurther
> > i suggest and guess that even the neutrino
> > is another link on that chain of orbitals
> > 4
> > oh yes i forgot to say that the =A0links of the orbitals on the chain
> > become bigger in range but smaller in mass
> > as they are located furtheraway =A0from the base strong orbilal
>
> > so how do you like that new(revolutionary =A0idea ??
>
> > TIA
> > Y.Porat
> > ------------------------ Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> and do you mean, that medium orbital is gravitational force?- Hide quoted =
text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-----------------
no but thank you for your question
i forgit to note it may be because i wahted to be short
so please listen caerully because it is immensly interesting:

the what i called medium orbitals
are not just one but **3 of them** in a subchain
they are not only abstract orbitals ]
i found exacly ther mass !!
by bingind energy losses !!

each of them is 0.00125 AMU
and there are 3 !! of them all thogether
0.00375 AMU

does the number 3 reminds you of something ??
if not
the 0.00375 amu
is about the mass of the ..... Quark !!!

so the magic figure 3 that i discovered as building
binding energies
fits accidentally (i di dnt think about it while discovering it)
so its fits the 3 quark theory and experimentally founf mass
of quarks...
now you understand why i am so angree
while people say that the proton of neutron is composed of
3 quarks mysterious 'glueone' (that fill' the 90 percent mass
missing)and 'fullo stop !!
pretending as if they know completely the structre of the nucleid !!

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------