sci.physics.particle

On Apr 8, 3:47=A0am, Eric Gisse wrote:
> On Apr 7, 4:56=A0pm, "terrylhewettsr" wrote:
>
> > "uri" wrote in message
>
> >news:b0e60d3d-fd95-4e7b-b7dd-4d7b865c742c@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...=

>
> > > In physics forum they ban people forever. Why ban forever? Why not
> > > give a person a second chance?
>
> > It's academia's way or the highway. Unfortunately academia has reached a=

> > dead end. very few new discoveries will be made if academia doesn't star=
t
> > listening to the laymen. It is the ones doing the banning that is grevou=
sly
> > wrong.
>
> What could the ignorant hope to contribute to a highly technical field?

----------------
and what are the contributions of the little
pompous farter Gisse ??
(and other little parrots ??!!)
2
now to the question what was the last contribution
of a ;'''noneducated' to science ??:

Michael faradey contributed to sci and** our well fair**
much more than most 'educated ' 'modern scientists
and had i tried hard to find more beside Faradey
i could add a lot
i am sure other readers could ad more on the long list

3
to show that some of 'modern physics
is pompous bullshit
is not least a contribution for the advance of science
for example

curved space time
virtuall massless particle
massless energy
shell structure of heavy Atoms

etc etc etc

ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------------