sci.physics.particle

On Feb 14, 9:12=A0am, Igor wrote:
> On Feb 13, 12:24=A0am, "Autymn D. C." wrote:
>
> > On Feb 12, 11:28=A0am, Igor wrote:
>
> > > Yes, Igor Khavkine is a moderator of sci.physics.research. =A0And he's=

> > > probably forgotten more physics than you'll ever understand. =A0Anythi=
ng
> > > else you wish to know?
>
> > whose assy moderator[s] wouldn't let my post on elemental alqali
> > superconductors on, without =A0reason.
>
> Most likely, you were the one without reason. =A0That's usually the
> central rationale for rejecting posts.

(But I'm the unlikeliest person in the world. And "for gerund noun"
is gibberish.) The reason was always in the post itself if not in its
link's paper. The moderator would not say what the group's
disinterest was with alqali superconductivity, especially as the
effect is unexpected for the s block, so his rejection was without
reason. (And my posts under "gimme money" were self-explanatory, so
they did not lack theoretic or empeiric proof. But the retarded
moderator couldn't back up his side.) And I'd expect such states to
be a good bridge for metallic superconductive hydrogen.

-Aut