sci.physics.particle

On Mar 13, 9:21=A0pm, Benj wrote:
> On Feb 27, 10:00 am, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=3DEMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
>
> > Benj =A0Spoken like a man that likes "hocus" "pocus" over science.
> > Reality is why not go all the way and make platinum,after all its worth
> > more than gold. Bert
>
> HISTORY! my good man! =A0TRADITION!
>
> How did you determine what I "like" and that it's "hocus pocus"?
> Alchemy has a long and royal history of achievement! Newton was an
> alchemist, you dolt! =A0Your post is spoken like a man who is ignorant
> of the entire history of his craft but yet embraces every "modern" fad
> that comes along without question whether it makes sense or not! =A0Did
> Thrice-Powerful Hermes make platinum? I think not dear boy! =A0Those
> determined to ignore history are doomed to repeat it!

----------------
as i saied before:

it should be easier to turn Lead to Gold
rather platinum to Gold
the reason that no body except me knowes is:

Gold and Platinum has a considerably different
basic skeleton structre
OTHH
Gold and Lead has the same basic structral (3D!)
skeleton
except some maginal differences
marginal i mead only at tehfron and abckloles of them
with in one case marginal deotrons
and in another case
proton and neutron couples instead the Deutrons
at the other case

ATB
Y.Porat
--------------------------