sci.physics.particle

On Mar 22, 6:50=A0pm, Igor wrote:
> On Mar 22, 6:27=A0am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 22, 7:00=A0am, Tom Roberts wrote:
>
> > > Pmb wrote:
> > > > What changes is when the neutron is inside is that there is an
> > > > energy related to the stong force and that energy has a mass equival=
ent. It
> > > > is not that the mass of the neutron changes.
>
> > > It is not clear that it even makes sense to discuss "a neutron" inside=
a
> > > nucleus. All the quarks and gluons of the neutron intermix quite
> > > strongly with the quarks and gluons from the other constituents of the=

> > > nucleus. In hindsight, it's quite remarkable that the nuclear shell
> > > model worked as well as it did (which was by no means perfect).
>
> > > On the other hand, counting protons and neutrons in a nucleus works
> > > exceedingly well. And yes, the sum of the masses of those protons and
> > > neutrons is larger than the mass of the nucleus they form -- that is
> > > inherent in binding constituents into a single compound object.
>
> > > Tom Roberts
>
> > --------------
> > if you dont know and dont understand
> > just say =A0- i dont know!!
>
> Maybe you should take your own advice once in awhile.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

-------------
surely for you as well !!

2
hey Igor
i can sense that in your back of your mind
you are some how interested in my ideas !! (or else
why at all you read me and dont completely ignore me ??? (:-)
3
i dont like hypocracy !!!

ATB
Y.Porat
-------------------------