"Don Kelly"
>
> There is a region of influence which we call a field-thermal,
> gravitational, electrical, magnetic, pressure, etc - this "field" exists
> independently of how we describe it. Our model is just a useful way to
> describe it but our description doesn't impinge on its reality.
I have a proposal. If we are sure that the only influence exist we should
say field of ....... Example: Electric charge "produces" electric field. But
no magnetic pole so we should say "field of magnet" or "field of selenoid".
It would be easy to realise that magnetism is a product of math. It is a by
product of "incompressible fluid" in wires.
S*
>